Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for the Quantitative Assessment of Acute Ionizing Radiation Induced Skin Toxicity Using a Mouse Model
Published on: May 27, 2016
A comparison of the thermal-dose equation and the intensity-time product, Itm, for predicting tissue damage
Gerald R Harris1, Bruce A Herman, Matthew R Myers
1U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, USA. gerald.harris@fda.hhs.gov
Abstract:
Thermal dose is the most generally accepted concept for estimating temperature-related tissue damage thresholds in high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) procedures. However, another approach based on the intensity-time product I t(m) =D has been used, where D is a tissue-dependent damage threshold, I is the spatial-peak, temporal-average intensity and t is time. In this study, these two approaches were compared analytically by substituting a well-known soft-tissue solution for temperature vs. time into the thermal dose equation. From power law fits of I vs. t, m was found to fall between about 0.3 and 0.8. In terms of the intensity required for cell death for a given exposure time, the standard deviation of the error between the full thermal-dose formulation and the I t(m) =D prediction based upon the power-law fit was less than 5% for focal beam diameters up to 3 mm. Thus, for the practical range of HIFU parameters examined, the intensity-time product relationship is equivalent to the thermal dose formulation.
Related Concept Videos
Absorption of Radiation
Intensity Of Electromagnetic Waves
Improper Integrals: Infinite Intervals
Biological Effects of Radiation
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic
Toxicokinetics: Overview

