Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

18.6K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
18.6K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

1.7K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
1.7K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.5K
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models01:14

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models

888
Compartmental analysis is a widely adopted approach to characterizing drug pharmacokinetics. It uses compartment models that conceptualize the body as a collection of reversibly communicating compartments, each representing a group of tissues exhibiting similar drug distribution characteristics. The movement rate of the drug between these compartments is typically described by first-order kinetics.
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
888
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

333
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
333
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model01:09

Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model

119
Drug response models describe how pharmacological agents interact with biological systems to produce measurable effects. Baseline responses are inherent physiological activities without a drug significantly influencing the observed pharmacological outcomes. Depending on the drug response model employed, these baseline responses may combine with the drug's effect in either an additive or proportional manner.Additive Drug Response ModelIn the additive model, the drug effect is independent of the...
119

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role of streetscape feature in pedestrian safety: A modified multi-level multiple membership model.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Influences of illuminated speed limit markings on driving behaviors-A driving simulation study.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Exploring pedestrian gap acceptance behaviour using immersive CAVE experiments: A multilevel logit regression model.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Modeling bounded rationality in pedestrian-vehicle interactions at non-signalized crosswalks: A game theoretic quantal response equilibrium approach.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

MRI evaluation of congenital vaginal malformations-a pictorial review.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: APOBEC3 mutagenesis drives therapy resistance in breast cancer.

Nature genetics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

9.9K

A joint-probability approach to crash prediction models.

Xin Pei1, S C Wong, N N Sze

  • 1Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong. peix@hkusua.hku.hk

Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|March 8, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a joint probability model for road safety, integrating crash occurrence and severity predictions. This new approach offers a statistically sounder analysis of factors influencing crash risk.

More Related Videos

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

9.9K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Road safety research
  • Traffic engineering
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Traditional crash prediction models (e.g., Poisson, negative binomial) often model crash frequencies by severity separately.
  • This separation can lead to correlations between model estimates across different severity levels.
  • Existing methods have limitations in interpreting the influence of explanatory factors on crash occurrence across various severity levels.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel joint probability model that integrates crash occurrence and severity predictions into a unified framework.
  • To address the limitations of separate modeling approaches in road safety research.
  • To provide a more appropriate interpretation of explanatory factors' effects on crash occurrence and severity.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a joint probability model for integrated crash occurrence and severity prediction.
  • Application of the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach within a full Bayesian framework for model estimation.
  • Conducting a case study on crash risk at signalized intersections in Hong Kong to demonstrate the model's utility.

Main Results:

  • The proposed joint probability model demonstrates a good statistical fit for analyzing crash data.
  • The model effectively provides an appropriate analysis of the influences of explanatory factors on crash occurrence and severity.
  • Case study results validate the model's performance in a real-world traffic scenario.

Conclusions:

  • The joint probability model offers a statistically robust and interpretable approach to road safety analysis.
  • This integrated framework overcomes limitations associated with separately modeling crash frequencies by severity.
  • The study highlights the importance of unified modeling for understanding complex crash dynamics and informing safety interventions.