Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Development of Analytical Methods01:21

Development of Analytical Methods

An analytical methodology can be divided into four sequential steps: technique, method, procedure, and protocol. A technique is a scientific principle that rationalizes a specific phenomenon through chemical measurements. Adapting a technique for analyzing a sample of interest is termed a method. The procedure outlines the directions for performing the analysis via an analytical method. The protocol is the detailed guidelines on the procedure, which should be strictly followed to obtain the...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

We Should Pay More Attention to Cross-sectoral Cooperation, Incentives and Practice-Oriented Evaluation Comment on "The Effect of Integrated Care After Discharge From Hospitals on Outcomes Among Korean Older Adults".

International journal of health policy and management·2026
Same author

Psychosocial distress in heart failure with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BJGP open·2026
Same author

[Outpatient diagnoses in primary care: Adding transparency in the field of outpatient diagnoses].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
Same author

The impact of Choosing Wisely<sup>TM</sup> recommendations and insurance coverage restrictions on the provision of low-value care: an interrupted time series analysis of vitamin D tests.

BMC health services research·2025
Same author

Impact of atrial fibrillation on productivity in working-age patients: an analysis of Swiss-AF prospective cohort study data.

Swiss medical weekly·2025
Same author

Explaining presenteeism behaviour with the theory of planned behaviour - a longitudinal study.

International archives of occupational and environmental health·2024
Same journal

["Bringing one's own unique perspective into research" - Participants' experiences and perceptions regarding the implementation of a citizen advisory board in general practice research].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
Same journal

Developing a non-pharmacological pain management toolkit in nursing homes using a structured evidence-generation approach.

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
Same journal

[Between proximity and need: Determinants of longer travel times to emergency departments - A sub-evaluation of the utilisation survey in Bavarian emergency departments].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
Same journal

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
Same journal

[Patient involvement in clinical research: An explorative interview study on researchers' perspectives, barriers, and support needs].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
Same journal

[Requirements for an effective application of artificial intelligence in interpersonal communication in healthcare: A scoping review].

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

[Developing quality indicators: background, methods and problems].

Thomas Kötter1, Friederike Schaefer, Eva Blozik

  • 1Institut für Sozialmedizin, Professur Versorgungsforschung und ihre Methoden, Universität zu Lübeck. thomas.koetter@uk-sh.de

Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen
|March 9, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quality indicators (QIs) measure and compare healthcare quality. Developing high-quality QIs requires rigorous, evidence-based methods, as no standard currently exists.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare quality measurement
  • Health services research

Context:

  • Quality indicators (QIs) are integral to healthcare quality management.
  • QIs are utilized for provider comparisons and pay-for-performance initiatives.

Purpose:

  • To highlight the necessity of robust methods for developing high-quality healthcare QIs.
  • To address the current lack of a standardized approach to QI development.

Summary:

  • QIs are specific, measurable aspects of healthcare used to assess and improve quality.
  • Current QI development relies on expert opinion, evidence, or guidelines.
  • There is an unmet need for a gold standard in QI development.

Impact:

  • Improved healthcare quality through standardized QI development.
  • Enhanced comparability and accountability in healthcare delivery.
  • Foundation for future research into optimal QI development methodologies.