Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Fabrication of Spatially Confined Complex Oxides
Published on: July 1, 2013
London penetration depth in the tight binding approximation: orthorhombic distortion and oxygen isotope effects in
M V Eremin1, I A Larionov, I E Lyubin
1Department of Physics, Kazan State University, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Abstract:
We present a simple derivation of an expression for the superfluid density n(s) α 1/λ(2) in superconductors with the tight binding energy dispersion. The derived expression is discussed in detail because of its distinction from the known expressions for ordinary superconductors with parabolic energy dispersion. We apply this expression for the experimental data analysis of the isotope effect in London penetration depth parameter λ in the BiSrCuO and YBaCuO family compounds near optimal doping, taking into account the orthorhombic distortion of crystal structure, and estimate the isotopic change of hopping parameters from the experimental data. We point out that 1/λ(2) temperature behaviour is very sensitive to the ratio 2Δ(m)(T = 0)/k(B)T(c) and estimate this quantity for a number of compounds.
Related Concept Videos
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Stoichiometric Point Defects
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Non-Stoichiometric Defects
Bonding in Metals
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Point, Line and Plane Defects
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...

