Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026
08:12
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
Optimum bias in selection index parameters estimated with uncertainty
1Institute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Summary
Biasing selection index parameters can increase expected genetic gain when estimates are uncertain. This method reduces the risk of large efficiency losses, improving animal breeding programs.
Area of Science:
- Quantitative genetics
- Animal breeding
- Statistical genetics
Background:
- Selection index weights are typically derived assuming population and economic parameters are known with certainty.
- In practice, parameter estimates with inherent uncertainty are used, potentially impacting selection efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of parameter uncertainty on selection index efficiency.
- To develop a method for deriving optimum biased selection index weights under parameter uncertainty.
Main Methods:
- Incorporating error probability distributions of uncertain parameter estimates.
- Describing a method for deriving optimum biased selection index weights.
- Analyzing asymmetrical effects of parameter estimate errors on selection index efficiency.
Main Results:
- Biasing parameter estimates can increase expected response from selection when errors have asymmetrical effects.
- Moderate increases (2-5%) in expected response were observed with uncertain heritability and economic weights.
- Failure to account for uncertainty leads to overestimation of selection value.
Conclusions:
- Deriving optimum biased selection index weights is beneficial when parameter estimates are uncertain.
- The method improves the reliability of expected genetic gain predictions.
- Applications exist for both practical animal improvement and theoretical research.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
01:22Bias
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
00:59Uncertainty: Overview
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
00:54Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
01:13Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
01:30Unrealistic Optimism Bias
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...