Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
Published on: August 26, 2018
Methods for investigating decision making in health care network meetings
Hazel E Harden1, Simon E Locke
1Health Management Research Alliance, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Objective:
To demonstrate a method of describing and analysing the interactions between people engaged in decision making in health care network meetings.
Method:
Analysis of the meeting interaction involved three steps: recording the meeting, annotating the verbal interactions of the meeting, and calculating various metrics from the annotations. Each annotation represented one utterance by one person. Annotations were assigned start and end times and an associated behaviour from four mutually exclusive behaviour categories. We used software and algorithms developed for this process at the Australian e-Health Research Centre.
Results:
A meeting interaction fingerprint was produced from one meeting, which consisted of a set of metrics describing different aspects of the interaction between participants in the meeting.
Conclusions:
Creating meeting fingerprints and analysing the interactions between meeting participants has the potential to provide feedback to improve decision making in health care network teams.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas II
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Critical Thinking II
Critical Thinking I