Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Evidence for Evolution

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.The collection of fossils within sedimentary rocks give a record of common ancestry and often depicts the history of evolution.

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...

What is Natural Selection?

What is Natural Selection?

Natural selection is an evolutionary process in which individuals with survival-promoting traits reproduce at higher rates. These favorable traits become more common within a population or species. Naturally selected traits initially arise via random genetic mutations. In order for selection to occur, there must be variation within a population, the trait controlling the variation must be heritable, and there must be an evolutionary advantage for variation in the trait.The Theory of Natural...

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Semi-automated bone tracking in dynamic CINE MRI during controlled knee motion.

Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik·2025

Same author

Simultaneous determination of guanidinoacetate, creatine and creatinine in urine and plasma by un-derivatized liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2008

Same author

A marker-dense physical map of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum genome.

Genome research·2001

Same author

Differential regulation of a family of apyrase genes from Medicago truncatula.

Plant physiology·2001

Same author

Sulfation pharmacogenetics: SULT1A1 and SULT1A2 allele frequencies in Caucasian, Chinese and African-American subjects.

Pharmacogenetics·2001

Same author

Human 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthetase: radiochemical enzymatic assay, biochemical properties, and hepatic variation.

Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals·2001

Same journal

From head to tail: does habitat use drive morphological variation in snakes?

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026

Same journal

Plant hormone manipulation impacts salt spray tolerance, which preempts herbivory as a driver of local adaptation in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026

Same journal

Influence of the resource acquisition-allocation Y-model's parameters on the detection of phenotypic trade-offs.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026

Same journal

Chromosomal inversions may assist acute salinity and temperature adaptation in Atlantic cod eggs.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026

Same journal

Quantitative genetics of shy-bold behaviour and plastic response to novel predator cues in the cherry shrimp, Neocaridina davidi.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026

Same journal

Do interactions between different Selfish Genetic Elements matter?

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Published on: April 1, 2016

Using creation science to demonstrate evolution? Senter's strategy revisited.

¹Center for Origins Research, Bryan College, Dayton, TN 37321, USA. wood@bryancore.org

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

|March 16, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study re-examined Senter's dinosaur-bird morphological continuity findings. While some methods support continuity, others do not, potentially limiting the impact on creationism arguments.

More Related Videos

Using Sniper-Cas9 to Minimize Off-target Effects of CRISPR-Cas9 Without the Loss of On-target Activity Via Directed Evolution

Using Sniper-Cas9 to Minimize Off-target Effects of CRISPR-Cas9 Without the Loss of On-target Activity Via Directed Evolution

Published on: February 26, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Published on: April 1, 2016

Using Sniper-Cas9 to Minimize Off-target Effects of CRISPR-Cas9 Without the Loss of On-target Activity Via Directed Evolution

Using Sniper-Cas9 to Minimize Off-target Effects of CRISPR-Cas9 Without the Loss of On-target Activity Via Directed Evolution

Published on: February 26, 2019

Area of Science:

Paleontology
Evolutionary Biology
Philosophy of Science

Background:

Creationist arguments often focus on perceived phylogenetic discontinuities.
Senter attempted to refute these by demonstrating morphological continuity between birds and nonavian dinosaurs.
Classical multidimensional scaling (CMDS) was employed in this initial analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To re-evaluate Senter's findings on morphological continuity between birds and nonavian dinosaurs.
To assess the impact of Senter's methodology on creationist arguments.
To explore alternative analytical methods for evaluating phylogenetic relationships.

Main Methods:

Re-examination of Senter's data using 'distance correlation,' a method relevant to creationist 'created kinds' classifications.
Analysis of morphological data from birds and nonavian dinosaurs.
Comparison of results obtained from CMDS and distance correlation.

Main Results:

Distance correlation supported Senter's conclusion of morphological continuity with his original dataset.
However, analyses using different sets of taxa and more characters did not support morphological continuity.
These mixed results suggest a nuanced interpretation of the data.

Conclusions:

Senter's strategy may have a limited impact on creationist arguments due to the mixed results.
Future fossil discoveries could potentially strengthen the evidence for morphological continuity.
The debate regarding evolutionary transitions and creationist interpretations remains ongoing.