Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DTH: a nonparametric test for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Identifying Inheritance Patterns of Allelic Imbalance, using Integrative Modeling and Bayesian Inference.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Modeling gene regulatory perturbations via deep learning from high-throughput reporter assays.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Structured Pooling Improves Detection of Rare Regulatory Mutations in Population-Scale Reporter Assays.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Cell modeling and rescue of a novel noncoding genetic cause of glycogen storage disease IX.

Genetics in medicine open·2026
Same author

Identifying unmeasured heterogeneity in microbiome data via quantile thresholding (QuanT).

Microbiome·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Control for confounding in case-control studies using the stratification score, a retrospective balancing score.

Andrew S Allen1, Glen A Satten

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics,School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

American Journal of Epidemiology
|March 16, 2011
PubMed
Summary

The stratification score balances confounders in case-control studies, similar to propensity scores in prospective research. This method allows comparing exposure distributions between cases and controls under standardized confounding variables.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Genetic Epidemiology

Background:

  • Case-control studies are susceptible to confounding bias.
  • Propensity scores are established for balancing covariates in prospective studies.
  • A similar tool for case-control studies is needed to address confounding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce and define the stratification score for case-control studies.
  • Demonstrate its role as a retrospective balancing score.
  • Illustrate its application in comparing exposure distributions.

Main Methods:

  • Model disease probability as a function of confounders to derive the stratification score.
  • Establish the stratification score as a retrospective balancing score.
  • Apply standardization using the stratification score to compare exposure distributions.

Main Results:

  • The stratification score is shown to be a retrospective balancing score.
  • Standardization with the stratification score enables comparison of exposure distributions between cases and controls.
  • The method was applied to a genome-wide association study of schizophrenia.

Conclusions:

  • The stratification score is a valuable tool for confounding control in case-control studies.
  • It facilitates standardized comparisons of exposures, adjusting for confounding.
  • This approach enhances the validity of findings from genetic association studies.