Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Routine Screening Method for Microparticles in Platelet Transfusions
Published on: January 31, 2018
Risk-reduction strategies for platelet transfusion in the United States
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. vamvakase@cshs.org
Platelet pathogen reduction systems may reduce transfusion-transmitted infections and sepsis risks. However, they may increase bleeding complications, requiring careful risk-benefit analysis for optimal patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Transfusion Medicine
- Infectious Disease Prevention
- Blood Component Safety
Background:
- Transfusion-associated bacteremia/sepsis (TABS) and transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) remain significant risks despite bacterial cultures.
- Emerging TTIs pose a future threat, potentially mirroring past HIV epidemics.
- Platelet pathogen-reduction (PR) systems, licensed in Europe, may soon be available in the U.S.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate alternative strategies for reducing residual risks of TTIs and TABS with future U.S. PR systems.
- To compare risks and benefits of non-pathogen-reduced single-donor platelets, pathogen-reduced single-donor platelets, and pathogen-reduced pooled whole-blood-derived (PWBD) platelets.
- To inform decisions regarding the optimal approach to platelet transfusion safety.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of existing data and potential future strategies for platelet transfusion.
- Comparison of risks associated with different platelet preparation methods (single-donor vs. PWBD, PR vs. non-PR).
- Consideration of adverse events, including bleeding complications and pathogen transmission.
Main Results:
- Single-donor platelets (SDP) reduce TTI and TABS risks twofold compared to PWBD platelets, without added risk.
- PR of platelets may increase mild/moderate bleeding risks and does not eliminate all pathogen risks.
- Multicomponent apheresis using SDP can reduce donor exposures and potentially transfusion-related acute lung injury.
Conclusions:
- Future U.S. strategies may include non-PR SDP, PR SDP, or PR PWBD platelets.
- The choice between PR and non-PR SDP requires precise quantification of PR-associated bleeding risks versus TABS/TTI risks.
- Balancing bleeding risks with infection prevention is crucial for selecting the safest platelet transfusion strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Blood Transfusion and Agglutination
History
The history of blood transfusion dates back to the 17th century, when early attempts were made in animals. In 1818 James Blundell, a British doctor, performed the first successful human blood transfusion. Later in 1900, Karl...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Blood Transfusion
Blood Transfusion Overview
A blood transfusion is a medical procedure used to replace blood lost due to injury, surgery, or to treat conditions such as anemia or cancer. During a transfusion, donor blood is...
Formation of the Platelet Plug
As the injured blood vessel contracts, endothelial cells undergo contraction, revealing collagen fibers in the basement membrane and underlying connective tissue. Furthermore, the plasma membrane of endothelial cells becomes adhesive, preparing the site for platelet adhesion. Platelets...
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management

