Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II01:19

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II

In the application of the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, two specific scenarios can arise that complicate stability analysis.
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first column of the Routh...
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I01:15

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I

Consider an electrical power grid, where stability is essential to prevent blackouts. The Routh-Hurwitz criterion is a valuable tool for assessing system stability under varying load conditions or faults. By analyzing the closed-loop transfer function, the Routh-Hurwitz criterion helps determine whether the system remains stable.
To apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, a Routh table is constructed. The table's rows are labeled with powers of the complex frequency variable s, starting from the...
Mutual Inductance01:24

Mutual Inductance

Inductance is the property of a device that tells us how effectively it induces an emf in another device. In other words, it is a physical quantity that expresses the effectiveness of a given device.
When two circuits carrying time-varying currents are close to one another, the magnetic flux through each circuit varies because of the changing current in the other circuit. Consequently, an emf is induced in each circuit by the changing current in the other. Therefore, this type of emf is called...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aftermath epidemics: Percolation on the sites visited by generalized random walks.

Physical review. E·2023
Same author

Many universality classes in an interface model restricted to non-negative heights.

Physical review. E·2023
Same author

On Generalized Schürmann Entropy Estimators.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Universality of Critically Pinned Interfaces in Two-Dimensional Isotropic Random Media.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

How fast does a random walk cover a torus?

Physical review. E·2018
Same author

Self-Trapping Self-Repelling Random Walks.

Physical review letters·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans
09:23

Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans

Published on: August 16, 2017

Lower bounds on mutual information.

David V Foster1, Peter Grassberger

  • 1Complexity Science Group, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
|March 17, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study corrects previous claims on mutual information bounds. We demonstrate that bounds using linear correlations depend on variable distributions, offering new insights with gene expression data.

More Related Videos

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans
09:23

Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans

Published on: August 16, 2017

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Information Theory
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Mutual Information (MI) quantifies statistical dependence between random variables.
  • Previous work established lower bounds on MI for real-valued variables.
  • These bounds are crucial for understanding complex systems and data analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To correct and refine existing lower bounds on mutual information (MI).
  • To investigate the dependence of these bounds on marginal distributions of variables.
  • To explore practical applications of these refined bounds, particularly in biological data.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of mutual information and correlation measures.
  • Derivation of bounds based on marginal distributions (Gaussian and uniform).
  • Application of rank-based transformations to enforce uniform marginals and use Spearman correlations.
  • Analysis of gene expression datasets to validate the bounds.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that non-trivial lower bounds on MI depend on marginal distributions.
  • Identified Gaussian and uniform distributions as yielding simplest and most practical bounds, respectively.
  • Showcased the utility of Spearman correlation coefficients for bounding MI via rank transformation.
  • Revealed nontrivial bounds in gene expression data, with saturation degree offering valuable insights.

Conclusions:

  • Existing claims regarding mutual information lower bounds require correction due to distribution dependence.
  • Rank-based transformations provide a robust method for establishing practical MI bounds.
  • The derived bounds offer significant utility for analyzing complex datasets, such as gene expression data.