Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
Published on: August 1, 2017
A decade with the mental health act, 1987
1MD., DPM., MRCPsch., Consultant Psychiatrist, 20/380, Poothole Road, Trichur-680004, Kerala.
The Mental Health Act, 1987 needs amendments to ensure government mental hospitals are supervised and to protect the rights of all individuals with mental illness. Strengthening the Act through updated rules and potential government funding is crucial for patient welfare.
Area of Science:
- Public Health Law
- Mental Health Policy
- Human Rights Law
Background:
- The Mental Health Act, 1987, enacted in 1993, established Mental Health Authorities but has shortcomings regarding government mental hospital oversight.
- A significant challenge is the substantial capital investment required for upgrading government mental hospitals, hindering their improvement.
- Current provisions inadequately address the needs of profoundly intellectually disabled individuals and create admission hurdles for psychiatric patients in general hospitals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify shortcomings in the Mental Health Act, 1987, concerning the oversight of government mental hospitals and patient rights.
- To propose necessary amendments and rule changes to enhance the Act's effectiveness and ensure comprehensive patient care.
- To explore mechanisms for funding the necessary upgrades to government mental hospital infrastructure.
Main Methods:
- Legal analysis of the Mental Health Act, 1987 and its implementation.
- Review of existing mental health care provisions and identification of gaps.
- Comparative analysis of legal frameworks and best practices in mental health care.
- Examination of judicial and administrative processes related to mental health admissions and treatment.
Main Results:
- Government mental hospitals currently operate outside the direct scrutiny of Mental Health Authorities, representing a critical oversight gap.
- The Act's current form presents challenges for profoundly intellectually disabled individuals seeking psychiatric care and creates undue burdens for patients in general hospitals.
- Judicial determination of psychiatric illness without expert evidence is problematic and undermines justice.
- Amendments to the Act, engagement with High Courts, and refined State Mental Health Rules are necessary to rectify these issues.
Conclusions:
- The Mental Health Act, 1987, requires strategic amendments and the development of supportive State Mental Health Rules to strengthen patient rights.
- Establishing a dedicated funding agency by the Government of India is essential for upgrading mental health facilities.
- Ensuring all mental health facilities, particularly government hospitals, are under effective regulatory oversight is paramount for patient protection and effective mental healthcare delivery.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Treatment Strategies for Psychological Disorders
Psychological therapies focus on modifying emotions, thoughts, and behaviors through talking, interpreting, listening, rewarding, challenging, and modeling. Clinical psychologists, counselors, and social workers commonly practice psychotherapy. Clinical...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Standards of Care II
Introduction to Psychological Disorders
Deviant Behavior
Deviance in behavior refers to actions or thought patterns that significantly diverge from societal norms or...
