Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

08:35
Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source
Published on: May 29, 2021
Fast local fragment chaining using sum-of-pair gap costs
Christian Otto1, Steve Hoffmann, Jan Gorodkin
1Bioinformatics Group, Dept, of Computer Science, University of Leipzig, Germany. studla@bioinf.uni-leipzig.de.
Algorithms for Molecular Biology : AMB
|March 23, 2011
Summary
Fragment chaining enhances sequence alignment by connecting short match fragments, improving homology detection in large genomes. This new method supports sum-of-pair gap costs for increased accuracy and sensitivity.
Area of Science:
- Bioinformatics
- Comparative Genomics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Fast seed-based alignment heuristics (e.g., BLAST, BLAT) are crucial for comparative genomics, especially for large mammalian genomes.
- Alignment sensitivity and specificity depend on parameters like seed size and expectation values.
- High-sensitivity searches generate numerous short local match fragments, necessitating efficient processing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a fast and flexible fragment chainer for connecting and scoring local alignment fragments.
- To introduce and implement a sum-of-pair gap cost model for fragment chaining, enhancing accuracy and sensitivity.
- To provide a tool that outperforms existing methods for fragment chaining.
Main Methods:
- Developed a novel fragment chainer with a time-efficient index structure.
- Implemented support for both linear and sum-of-pair gap cost models.
- Applied the fragment chainer to outputs from alignment tools like segemehl and BLAST.
Main Results:
- The new fragment chainer outperforms existing tools under the linear gap cost model.
- The sum-of-pair gap cost model demonstrates substantial advantages in accuracy and sensitivity.
- Demonstrated the utility in homology-based searches for human and mouse snoRNAs using BLAST and chaining.
Conclusions:
- Fragment chaining effectively identifies homologous regions missed by local alignment heuristics alone.
- The inclusion of both linear and sum-of-pair gap cost models broadens the tool's applicability.
- The software 'clasp' is available for researchers to utilize these advanced fragment chaining capabilities.
Related Concept Videos
Long-patch Base Excision Repair
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing
In the same year as the discovery of the Sanger sequencing method, another group of scientists, Allan Maxam and Walter Gilbert, demonstrated their chemical-cleavage method for DNA sequencing. The Maxam-Gilbert method relies on using different chemicals that can cleave the DNA sequence at specific sites, the separation of resulting DNA fragments of variable size using electrophoresis, and deciphering the DNA sequence from the resulting gel bands.
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...
Next-generation Sequencing
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features.
Lagging Strand Synthesis
During replication, the complementary strands in double-stranded DNA are synthesized at different rates. Replication first begins on the leading strand. Replication starts later, occurs more slowly, and proceeds discontinuously on the lagging strand.
There are several major differences between synthesis of the leading strand and synthesis of the lagging strand. 1) Leading strand synthesis happens in the direction of replication fork opening, whereas lagging strand synthesis happens in the...
There are several major differences between synthesis of the leading strand and synthesis of the lagging strand. 1) Leading strand synthesis happens in the direction of replication fork opening, whereas lagging strand synthesis happens in the...
Lagging Strand Synthesis
During replication, the complementary strands in double-stranded DNA are synthesized at different rates. Replication first begins on the leading strand. Replication starts later, occurs more slowly, and proceeds discontinuously on the lagging strand.
There are several major differences between synthesis of the leading strand and synthesis of the lagging strand. 1) Leading strand synthesis happens in the direction of replication fork opening, whereas lagging strand synthesis happens in the...
There are several major differences between synthesis of the leading strand and synthesis of the lagging strand. 1) Leading strand synthesis happens in the direction of replication fork opening, whereas lagging strand synthesis happens in the...
Fixing Double-strand Breaks
The double-stranded structure of DNA has two major advantages. First, it serves as a safe repository of genetic information where one strand serves as the back-up in case the other strand is damaged. Second, the double-helical structure can be wrapped around proteins called histones to form nucleosomes, which can then be tightly wound to form chromosomes. This way, DNA chains up to 2 inches long can be contained within microscopic structures in a cell. A double-stranded break not only damages...

