Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

Bilateral simultaneous hip replacement versus bilateral sequential hip replacement. A 7-year data review.

Linda R Johnston1, Benedict A Clift, Rami J Abboud

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Dundee, TORT Centre, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, Scotland.

Orthopedic Nursing
|March 23, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Bilateral simultaneous hip replacement is a viable option, showing high patient satisfaction and similar functional improvements compared to sequential surgery. While sequential procedures may increase hospital stay, they might offer fewer adverse events.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proximal humerus fractures in adolescents: Experience from East of Scotland.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland·2022
Same author

Forecasting Posttreatment Outcome of Hallux Valgus Surgery Patients.

Foot & ankle international·2021
Same author

Kinematic 3-D motion analysis of shoulder resurfacing hemiarthroplasty - An objective assessment method.

Journal of biomechanics·2021
Same author

Immediate effect of kinesiology tape on ankle stability.

BMJ open sport & exercise medicine·2020
Same author

Editorial.

Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2019
Same author

Comparison of branded rugby headguards on their effectiveness in reducing impact on the head.

BMJ open sport & exercise medicine·2018

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Bilateral hip replacements are common procedures.
  • The choice between simultaneous and sequential surgery impacts patient outcomes and healthcare costs.
  • Collarless polished taper cemented hip prostheses are widely used.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare bilateral simultaneous versus sequential hip replacements.
  • To evaluate complications, revisions, patient satisfaction, and functional outcomes (Harris Hip Score).
  • To assess the use of collarless polished taper cemented hip prostheses.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 594 patients undergoing bilateral hip replacement.
  • Data collected by independent practitioners and processed by a University Audit Department.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

  • Comparison of outcomes between simultaneous and sequential surgical groups.

    • Main Results:

    • Both surgical approaches yielded high patient satisfaction rates.
    • Similar improvements in Harris Hip Score, indicating reduced pain and enhanced function.
    • Sequential bilateral hip replacement group had a longer hospital stay, suggesting higher costs.
    • Sequential group showed a lower incidence of adverse events.

    Conclusions:

    • Bilateral simultaneous hip replacement is a safe and effective option.
    • Sequential hip replacement may offer a reduced risk of adverse events, potentially offsetting increased hospital stay costs.
    • The choice of surgical approach should consider individual patient factors and risk profiles.