Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Schemas01:42

Schemas

A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Profiles of power: lateral posing asymmetries of emotional expression in political portraits.

Laterality·2026
Same author

Just noticeable difference thresholds of asynchrony and non-isochrony in a Multi-Instrumental groove-based context.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Face masks do not hinder gaze-triggered social attention.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Pupil Size Reflects Trial-Level Variability in Imagery Vividness During Immersive Storytelling but Not (or Hardly) Individual Differences in Trait Imagery.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Music Ensemble: a large dataset on musicianship, cognition, and personality in musicians and nonmusicians.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Neither inaccurate nor biased in later life: Age-related differences in the accuracy and bias of facial trustworthiness judgment.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same journal

Pronoun Resolution in Turkish: The Interplay of Referential Form, Word Order, and Implicit Causality.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

What's in a Color?: Language, Synesthesia, and Categorical Perception.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Large Language Models Estimate Fine-Grained Human Color-Concept Associations.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Processing spatial relations with different apertures of attention.

Bruno Laeng1, Matia Okubo, Ayako Saneyoshi

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, 1094 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway. bruno.laeng@psykologi.uio.no

Cognitive Science
|March 25, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Spatial attention influences how we process spatial information. Narrowing attention aids categorical judgments, while broadening it benefits coordinate spatial relations, impacting perception and cognitive processing.

More Related Videos

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

VisualEyes: A Modular Software System for Oculomotor Experimentation
10:41

VisualEyes: A Modular Software System for Oculomotor Experimentation

Published on: March 25, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

VisualEyes: A Modular Software System for Oculomotor Experimentation
10:41

VisualEyes: A Modular Software System for Oculomotor Experimentation

Published on: March 25, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Spatial Cognition
  • Neuropsychology

Background:

  • Neuropsychological and neural network studies suggest distinct processing for categorical and coordinate spatial information.
  • Existing research indicates that receptive field size influences the encoding of spatial judgments.
  • The role of spatial attention in modulating these spatial processing networks remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether spatial attention modulates the processing of categorical versus coordinate spatial relations.
  • To test the hypothesis that attention window size influences the efficiency of categorical and coordinate spatial transformations.

Main Methods:

  • A cueing procedure was used to manipulate the spatial attention window size, encompassing single or multiple objects.
  • Participants performed tasks involving categorical and coordinate spatial transformations under different attention conditions.
  • Reaction times for noticing categorical and coordinate spatial changes were measured.

Main Results:

  • Coordinate spatial transformations were identified faster than categorical transformations when the attention window was large.
  • Categorical spatial transformations were identified faster than coordinate transformations when the attention window was small.
  • Coordinate changes were detected faster when attention cued the space between objects compared to when it excluded this space.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial attention dynamically modulates the processing of spatial information, favoring coordinate relations with broader attention and categorical relations with narrower attention.
  • The findings support the hypothesis that attention window size influences the underlying coding mechanisms (coarse vs. fine) for spatial information.
  • Attention's ability to selectively process spatial relationships has implications for understanding perception and cognitive flexibility.