Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Behavioral Perspective on Personality01:19

The Behavioral Perspective on Personality

Behaviorists view personality as primarily shaped by environmental reinforcements and consequences. According to this perspective, behavior is influenced by external stimuli, and individuals adjust their actions based on rewards and punishments. Over time, learning histories — accumulated patterns of reinforcement — play a significant role in shaping personality. Behaviors that lead to positive outcomes are reinforced, while those resulting in negative outcomes are diminished. Radical...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing experimental design through Bayes factor design analysis: insights from multi-armed bandit tasks.

Wellcome open research·2026
Same author

AI-Discovered Cognitive Models Reveal Novel Insights into Human and Animal Learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Developmental Change in Structure Learning Reflects a Shift From Recency-Based to Relational Prediction.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Planning in the Brain: It's Not What You Think It Is.

Annual review of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Why sleep matters in chronic pain: evidence across the lifespan.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same author

Hybrid neural-cognitive models reveal how memory shapes human reward learning.

Nature human behaviour·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Model-based influences on humans' choices and striatal prediction errors.

Nathaniel D Daw1, Samuel J Gershman, Ben Seymour

  • 1Center for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA. daw@cns.nyu.edu

Neuron
|March 26, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Human decision-making integrates both model-free and model-based learning. Ventral striatal signals reflect both, challenging the idea of separate learning systems in the brain.

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Psychiatry

Background:

  • The mesostriatal dopamine system is linked to model-free reinforcement learning.
  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals in the ventral striatum correlate with model-free prediction errors.
  • Behavioral studies indicate that human decision-making also involves model-based planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interaction between model-based and model-free influences on human choice behavior.
  • To examine the purity of the ventral striatal BOLD signal as a sole indicator of model-free learning.
  • To explore the computational architecture underlying high-level human decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • A multistep decision task was designed to differentiate model-based and model-free influences on choice.
  • Behavioral data was analyzed to quantify the contributions of both learning systems.
  • fMRI BOLD signals in the ventral striatum were recorded and analyzed in relation to choice behavior.

Main Results:

  • Human choices reflected a combination of both model-based and model-free learning influences.
  • The ventral striatal BOLD signal mirrored these influences, reflecting both model-free and model-based predictions.
  • The proportions of model-based and model-free signals matched those that best explained choice behavior.

Conclusions:

  • The findings challenge the concept of a distinct, separate model-free learning system.
  • Results suggest a more integrated computational architecture for human decision-making.
  • The ventral striatal BOLD signal is not a pure report of model-free learning but reflects integrated value computations.