Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

07:43
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Total knee arthroplasty three-dimensional kinematic estimation prevision. From a two-dimensional fluoroscopy acquired
B P Lebel1, V Pineau, S L Gouzy
1Orthopedic Department, Caen University Hospital, avenue de la Côte-de-Nacre, 14033 Caen cedex, France. Lebel-b@chu-caen.fr
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research : OTSR
|March 29, 2011
Summary
This study evaluated the accuracy of single fluoroscopy for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) kinematics, finding larger errors than previously reported. Researchers recommend ensuring motion is in-plane for more reliable TKA kinematic analysis.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Accurate assessment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) kinematics is crucial for evaluating implant performance and patient outcomes.
- Single fluoroscopic imaging systems with computed-assisted design (CAD) model matching offer a potential method for determining six-degree of freedom (6DoF) TKA kinematics.
- Previous accuracy reports for these systems were based on idealized laboratory conditions, potentially overestimating their real-world performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the true accuracy of a flat panel single plane video-fluoroscopy system using CAD model matching for TKA kinematics.
- To compare the accuracy of fluoroscopy-based TKA kinematics with simultaneously obtained optoelectronic measurements, considered the gold standard.
- To highlight the underestimation of errors associated with 2D/3D fluoroscopic registration in practical clinical settings.
Main Methods:
- A TKA was implanted into cadaveric femur and tibia.
- Thirty knee flexion cycles were simultaneously recorded using single plane fluoroscopy and an active optical tracking system.
- Kinematic data were compared using root mean square error (RMS), concordance correlation coefficient, and Bland & Altman analysis.
Main Results:
- The mean range of motion during flexion was 106°.
- RMS errors were 0.68° (flexion), 0.67° (varus-valgus), 1.02° (internal-external rotation), 1.3 mm (antero-posterior), 2.4 mm (medio-lateral), and 1.06 mm (proximo-distal).
- Significant outliers were observed, particularly in medio-lateral displacement, with extreme errors ranging from -5.4 mm to 22.1 mm.
Conclusions:
- The study identified outliers and systematic errors in all degrees of freedom, with larger standard deviations than previously published data.
- Ensuring the motion of interest is in the in-plane direction is critical for accurate fluoroscopic kinematic analysis.
- This research establishes a more realistic threshold for the detection capabilities of this TKA kinematic analysis technique in practical applications.
