Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Preserved or slightly depressed ejection fraction and outcomes after myocardial infarction
Apurva O Badheka1, Ankit Rathod, Aditya S Bharadwaj
1Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Insights
Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) predicts mortality in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Different methods for measuring EF are interchangeable and do not impact patient prognostication.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is a crucial prognostic marker in patients post-myocardial infarction (MI).
- Existing methods for EF assessment, including transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), contrast ventriculography (CNV), and radionuclide angiography (RNA), show high correlation but modest agreement.
- The impact of the chosen EF measurement modality on patient outcomes, particularly in those with preserved or mildly reduced EF, requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if the method used to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) influences the prognostication of post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with normal or mildly reduced EF.
- To analyze the predictive value of EF for mortality across different measurement modalities within the Prevention of Events with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition (PEACE) Trial cohort.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) limited access dataset of the PEACE Trial (n=8290).
- Cohort was stratified into groups based on EF assessment modality: TTE (n=2582), RNA (n=816), and CNV (n=1155).
- Multivariate analysis was performed to assess EF as a predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, comparing outcomes across different EF measurement groups.
Main Results:
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was a significant predictor of both cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.97) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.98) in the study population.
- Despite significant differences in baseline characteristics between TTE, RNA, and CNV groups, no significant differences in all-cause mortality were observed when comparing RNA (HR 1.13) or CNV (HR 1.13) to TTE.
- Similarly, cardiovascular mortality did not differ significantly between the RNA (HR 1.23) or CNV (HR 1.14) groups compared to the TTE group.
Conclusions:
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) remains a significant predictor of mortality in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with preserved or mildly depressed EF.
- The modality used for EF measurement (TTE, RNA, or CNV) is interchangeable and does not significantly alter the prognostic value of EF in this patient population.
- These findings support the consistent use of EF as a prognostic indicator regardless of the specific measurement technique employed in post-MI care.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients is a strong predictor of adverse cardiovascular events. Although resting EF as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), contrast ventriculography (CNV), and radionuclide angiography (RNA) exhibit high correlation, there is only modest agreement between these modalities. This study sought to explore whether modality of EF assessment influences prognostication of post-MI patients with normal or slightly reduced EF. METHODS AND RESULTS The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) limited access dataset of the Prevention of Events with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition (PEACE) Trial (1996-2003, n=8290) comparing trandolapril versus placebo was used. The cohort was partitioned into TTE (n=2582), RNA (n=816), and CNV (n=1155) groups based on modality of EF assessment. EF was a significant predictor of cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98; p<0.005) and all cause mortality (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 0.99; p=0.0002) on multivariate analysis in this population with preserved or mildly depressed EF. Although CNV, TTE, and RNA groups differed significantly in terms of baseline variables, no appreciable differences were noted between RNA (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.50; ns) and CNV (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.27; ns) groups, compared with TTE for all cause mortality. Similarly, no significant differences were observed for cardiovascular mortality between RNA (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.84; p=0.31) and CNV (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.67, p=0.49) versus TTE. CONCLUSION EF is a significant predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in patients with preserved or mildly depressed EF. Modalities of EF measurement are interchangeable and do not play a significant role in prognostication in a post-MI population.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send blood...
