Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026
Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
Short-Term Outcomes of Impella-Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Surgically Ineligible
Batla Falah1, Behnam N Tehrani2, Julia B Thompson1
1Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.
Background:
Impella-supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI) is an alternative for patients ineligible for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, limited data exist on patient characteristics, reasons for surgical turndown, and patient outcomes. This study aimed to characterize the baseline characteristics and short-term and intermediate-term outcomes of patients evaluated for CABG in the PROTECT III study.
Methods:
Patients enrolled in the PROTECT III study (NCT04136392), who underwent Impella-supported HRPCI, with an evaluable chart who were assessed by a cardiothoracic surgeon (CTS) for CABG were studied. Reasons for surgical turndown were derived from medical records. Baseline characteristics and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and repeat revascularization) at 30 and 90 days and all-cause mortality at 1 year were assessed. Observed to expected 30-day mortality ratios were calculated using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score.
Results:
Of 791 patients evaluated for CABG, 680 (86.0%) were turned down by a CTS, and 111 (14.0%) declined surgery. The most common reasons for surgical turndown were comorbidities (40%) and anatomical factors (25%). Compared with patients who declined surgery, patients turned down (deemed ineligible) by CTS had higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event at 30 days (9.2% vs 4.6%; P = .12) and 90 days (14.1% vs 4.6%; P = .02). The observed to expected mortality ratio, based on the STS risk score, was 1.43 (95% CI, 1.08-1.83).
Conclusions:
Impella-supported HRPCI is a viable alternative for high-risk patients deemed ineligible for CABG. Patients turned down by a CTS had worse clinical outcomes than those who declined surgery. The underestimation of 30-day mortality by the STS risk score suggests the need for improved risk prediction models in this high-risk cohort.
