Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Mouse Electroacupuncture Fixation Device Fabrication for Electroacupuncture Pretreatment in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
A decrease in glucose variability does not reduce cardiovascular event rates in type 2 diabetic patients after acute
Sarah E Siegelaar1, Lisa Kerr, Scott J Jacober
1Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. s.e.siegelaar@amc.uva.nl
Targeting postprandial hyperglycemia (PRANDIAL) reduced glucose variability (GV) in type 2 diabetes patients post-myocardial infarction. However, this strategy did not lower cardiovascular outcomes, questioning the benefit of targeting GV.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Syndrome
Background:
- Intraday glucose variability (GV) is a potential risk factor for cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients post-myocardial infarction (MI).
- The HEART2D study previously investigated the effects of different insulin strategies on cardiovascular outcomes in this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reanalyze the HEART2D study data to assess the impact of intraday GV on cardiovascular outcomes.
- To compare the effects of a postprandial (PRANDIAL) versus a basal (BASAL) insulin targeting strategy on GV and secondary cardiovascular events.
Main Methods:
- Reanalysis of data from the HEART2D study involving T2DM patients post-MI.
- Patients were randomized to PRANDIAL (n=557) or BASAL (n=558) insulin strategies.
- GV was quantified using mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), mean absolute glucose (MAG) change, and standard deviation (SD).
Main Results:
- The PRANDIAL strategy significantly reduced MAG by 18% compared to BASAL (P=0.02).
- MAGE and SD were lower in the PRANDIAL group, but these differences were not statistically significant.
- HbA1c levels and cardiovascular event rates were similar between the PRANDIAL and BASAL groups.
Conclusions:
- A PRANDIAL insulin strategy effectively reduced intraday GV compared to a BASAL strategy.
- Despite reduced GV, the PRANDIAL strategy did not lead to a significant reduction in cardiovascular outcomes.
- The findings do not support the hypothesis that targeting intraday GV is beneficial for reducing secondary cardiovascular events in T2DM patients post-MI.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Type II Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Type I Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and narrowing...
Atherosclerosis III: Management