Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

06:20
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Simplifying EPID dosimetry for IMRT treatment verification.
R Pecharromán-Gallego1, Anton Mans, Jan-Jakob Sonke
1Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.pecharroman@nki.nl
Medical Physics
|April 2, 2011
Summary
A new model for electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) simplifies intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose verification by calculating transmission, reducing measurement time. This method is suitable for clinical use, saving significant time.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy Dosimetry
Background:
- Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) are crucial for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose verification.
- Current backprojection models require patient-specific transmission measurements, which are time-consuming.
- The need for additional 'open images' prolongs the verification procedure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To modify an existing backprojection model for EPID-based IMRT dose verification.
- To eliminate the requirement for patient-specific transmission measurements, thereby accelerating the process.
- To assess the accuracy and clinical applicability of the modified model.
Main Methods:
- A novel model was developed to calculate phantom/patient transmission, incorporating beam hardening and off-axis EPID response effects.
- Model parameters were empirically determined using polystyrene phantoms and various photon beam energies (6, 10, 18 MV).
- The model was validated against EPID dose verification measurements for IMRT treatments across multiple cancer sites.
Main Results:
- The new model demonstrated good agreement with doses determined by the traditional method using measured transmission.
- Average differences in in vivo isocenter dose were within 2.6% for 6 MV, 0.2% for 10 MV, and 2.2% for 18 MV beams.
- Clinical implementation of the model is projected to save approximately 450 hours per year by eliminating open image measurements.
Conclusions:
- Calculating transmission instead of measuring it results in minimal differences in isocenter dose (generally <2%).
- The modified model is suitable for clinical implementation in IMRT dose verification.
- The elimination of open image measurements significantly streamlines the verification process.

