Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Calibration errors in digital subtraction radiography.

R L Webber1, U E Ruttimann, T J Heaven

  • 1University of Alabama School of Dentistry, Birmingham.

Journal of Periodontal Research
|September 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2008
Same author

Automated hybrid TACT volume reconstructions.

Methods of information in medicine·2004
Same author

Certainty and mortality prediction in critically ill children.

Journal of medical ethics·2004
Same author

Relevance of diagnostic diversity and patient volumes for quality and length of stay in pediatric intensive care units.

Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies·2003
Same author

Accuracy of tuned aperture computed tomography in the diagnosis of radicular fractures in non-restored maxillary anterior teeth--an in vitro study.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2002
Same author

Hand-held three-dimensional dental X-ray system: technical description and preliminary results.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2002
Same journal

Shifting Concepts in Esthetic-Zone Implant Therapy: Reflections From a 15-Year Institutional Registry.

Journal of periodontal research·2026
Same journal

Periodontitis as a Model for Inflammatory Uncoupling of Bone Remodeling.

Journal of periodontal research·2026
Same journal

Digital Implant Dentistry: The Past, the Present, the Future.

Journal of periodontal research·2026
Same journal

The Journey of Oral Hygiene: The Past, the Present, the Future.

Journal of periodontal research·2026
Same journal

The Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap (TCAF) for Root Coverage Procedures: Rationale, Indications, and a Novel Papilla-Based Decision Tree.

Journal of periodontal research·2026
Same journal

Viruses, Periodontitis, and Systemic Diseases.

Journal of periodontal research·2026
See all related articles

Digital subtraction radiography methods for measuring osseous change were evaluated. Both methods showed potential errors from overlying tissues, with specific error sources identified for each technique.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiography
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Digital subtraction radiography (DSR) is used to detect osseous changes.
  • Accurate measurement of bone loss or gain is crucial in various clinical applications.
  • Understanding error sources in DSR is vital for reliable diagnostic interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate two distinct methods for measuring osseous change using digital subtraction radiography.
  • To analyze and quantify potential errors introduced by soft and hard tissues in DSR measurements.
  • To compare the accuracy and limitations of the radiographic image method versus the subtraction image method.

Main Methods:

  • Two DSR methods were assessed: the radiographic image method and the subtraction image method.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Both methods utilized calibration wedges and assumed a 40 keV monoenergetic beam and compact bone as the reference standard.
  • Error analysis focused on factors like overlying soft tissues, bone replacement by soft tissue, and beam attenuation differences.

    • Main Results:

    • The radiographic image method involves comparing calibration wedges on both films to measure bone change.
    • The subtraction image method uses a single calibration wedge, matching the subtracted image's ROI to the wedge.
    • Error estimations were performed for specific issues like cheek inclusion and beam attenuation variations.

    Conclusions:

    • Both evaluated DSR methods have specific error profiles that need consideration for accurate osseous change detection.
    • The choice of DSR method may depend on the specific clinical scenario and the types of errors anticipated.
    • Further analysis of nonlinear error factors is necessary for a comprehensive understanding of DSR accuracy.