Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development01:30

Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development

Social-emotional experiences and cultural influences play significant roles in shaping gender development. During middle childhood, from ages 6 to 11, peer groups become dominant in reinforcing gender norms. Children in this age group often align with same-gender peer groups, which actively encourage behaviors that conform to traditional gender roles. For instance, boys may be discouraged from engaging in activities perceived as feminine, reinforcing culturally dictated norms about masculinity...
Socioemotional Development during Infancy01:30

Socioemotional Development during Infancy

Socio-emotional development in infancy is primarily shaped by early emotional responses and social connections, with temperament playing a central role. Temperament refers to the consistent patterns in an individual's emotional and behavioral responses, observable even in infancy. By examining temperament, researchers can better understand an infant's unique ways of interacting with the world, influencing subsequent personality and socio-emotional growth.
Primary Temperament Types
Stella Chess...
Impact of Social Context on Individuals01:21

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
Vygotsky's Cognitive Development in Cultural Context01:22

Vygotsky's Cognitive Development in Cultural Context

Lev Vygotsky, a pioneering Russian psychologist, developed a theory of cognitive development that centers on the influence of social and cultural factors. Unlike Jean Piaget, who emphasized the child's direct interaction with the physical world as key to development, Vygotsky argued that cognitive growth is an interpersonal process that unfolds within a cultural context. For Vygotsky, a child's learning cannot be separated from their social environment, which includes the values, beliefs, and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The face is the thing: Faces, not emotions, are responsible for chimeric perceptual asymmetry.

Laterality·2016
Same author

Viewing the workload of vigilance through the lenses of the NASA-TLX and the MRQ.

Human factors·2014
Same author

Preschool child and adult lateralisation and performance in emotion and language tasks.

Laterality·2012
Same author

Laterality and sex differences in tactile detection and two-point thresholds modified by body surface area and body fat ratio.

Somatosensory & motor research·2011
Same author

"Does degree of asymmetry relate to performance?" A critical review.

Brain and cognition·2011
Same author

A preliminary study of lateralized processing in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

The Journal of general psychology·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice
07:03

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice

Published on: July 31, 2019

Socioeconomic status, a forgotten variable in lateralization development.

David B Boles1

  • 1Department of Psychology, P.O. Box 870348, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35405, United States. dboles@bama.ua.edu

Brain and Cognition
|April 5, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Socioeconomic status (SES) impacts brain development. Reanalyzed data show lower SES groups exhibit reduced brain lateralization, suggesting potential maturation delays or reduced functional specialization.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Cerebral Lateralization in Children using Functional Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound (fTCD)
07:44

Assessment of Cerebral Lateralization in Children using Functional Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound (fTCD)

Published on: September 27, 2010

A Within-subjects Experimental Protocol to Assess the Effects of Social Input on Infant EEG
08:20

A Within-subjects Experimental Protocol to Assess the Effects of Social Input on Infant EEG

Published on: May 3, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice
07:03

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice

Published on: July 31, 2019

Assessment of Cerebral Lateralization in Children using Functional Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound (fTCD)
07:44

Assessment of Cerebral Lateralization in Children using Functional Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound (fTCD)

Published on: September 27, 2010

A Within-subjects Experimental Protocol to Assess the Effects of Social Input on Infant EEG
08:20

A Within-subjects Experimental Protocol to Assess the Effects of Social Input on Infant EEG

Published on: May 3, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Socioeconomic status (SES) is linked to various social health outcomes.
  • Previous studies (1970s-1980s) found no clear link between SES and hemispheric asymmetry.
  • Prior research lacked asymmetry measures that corrected for accuracy ceiling and floor effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reanalyze existing data on SES and hemispheric asymmetry.
  • To investigate if corrected asymmetry measures reveal a relationship between SES and lateralization.
  • To explore developmental implications of observed differences.

Main Methods:

  • Reanalysis of published data from dichotic listening, tactile dot enumeration, and visual recognition tasks.
  • Application of a laterality coefficient that corrects for ceiling and floor effects in accuracy.
  • Comparison of hemispheric asymmetry between lower and higher socioeconomic status (SES) groups.

Main Results:

  • Consistent findings across studies reveal reduced lateralization in lower SES groups.
  • The corrected laterality coefficient identified a significant difference not apparent in original analyses.
  • Results suggest potential developmental differences in brain organization related to SES.

Conclusions:

  • Reduced brain lateralization in lower SES groups may indicate delayed maturation or reduced functional specialization.
  • Corrected asymmetry measures are crucial for accurate comparisons across different performance levels.
  • Behavioral asymmetry measures can inform future structural and functional brain imaging research.