Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deep-learning map segmentation for protein X-ray crystallographic structure determination.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2024
Same author

The CCP4 suite: integrative software for macromolecular crystallography.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2023
Same author

Multivariate estimation of substructure amplitudes for a single-wavelength anomalous diffraction experiment.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2023
Same author

CCP4 Cloud for structure determination and project management in macromolecular crystallography.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2022
Same author

Selective coordination of three transition metal ions within a coiled-coil peptide scaffold.

Chemical science·2019
Same author

New Conformations of Acylation Adducts of Inhibitors of β-Lactamase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Biochemistry·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Enhancing Density Maps by Removing the Majority of Particles in Single Particle Cryogenic Electron Microscopy Final Stacks
06:41

Enhancing Density Maps by Removing the Majority of Particles in Single Particle Cryogenic Electron Microscopy Final Stacks

Published on: May 10, 2024

Reduction of density-modification bias by β correction.

Pavol Skubák1, Navraj S Pannu

  • 1Biophysical Structural Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. p.skubak@chem.leidenuniv.nl

Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography
|April 5, 2011
PubMed
Summary

A new method corrects phase quality overestimation in density modification, leading to more reliable figures of merit and better electron density maps. This improves automated model building in structural biology.

More Related Videos

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Enhancing Density Maps by Removing the Majority of Particles in Single Particle Cryogenic Electron Microscopy Final Stacks
06:41

Enhancing Density Maps by Removing the Majority of Particles in Single Particle Cryogenic Electron Microscopy Final Stacks

Published on: May 10, 2024

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Crystallography
  • Structural Biology
  • Computational Chemistry

Background:

  • Density modification in crystallography often overestimates phase quality, inflating figures of merit.
  • This overestimation hinders accurate structural analysis and model building.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel cross-validation-based method to correct phase quality estimation bias.
  • To improve the reliability of figures of merit and the quality of electron density maps.

Main Methods:

  • A bias-correction parameter 'β' is applied to maximum-likelihood phase-combination functions.
  • The method was tested on over 100 single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) data sets.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method yields significantly more reliable figures of merit compared to standard approaches.
  • Improved electron density maps were generated, facilitating better structural interpretation.
  • Automated model building and phased refinement showed enhanced performance using the corrected phase probabilities.

Conclusions:

  • The bias-correction method effectively addresses phase quality overestimation in density modification.
  • This leads to more accurate crystallographic phase determination and improved structural model building.
  • The approach offers a valuable tool for enhancing the reliability of crystallographic structure determination.