Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

Leaky Scanning

Leaky Scanning

During most eukaryotic translation processes, the small 40S ribosome subunit scans an mRNA from its 5' end until it encounters the first start AUG codon. The large 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the smaller one to initiate protein synthesis. The location of the translation initiation is largely determined by the nucleotides near the start codon as there may be multiple translation initiation sites present on the mRNA. Marilyn Kozak discovered that the sequence RCCAUGG (where R stands for...

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

Biasing of FET

Biasing of FET

Biasing a Junction Field Effect Transistor (JFET) is crucial for setting operational parameters and ensuring efficient functioning in electronic circuits. JFETs are characterized by using a single carrier type in N-channel or P-channel configurations, where the channel is surrounded by PN junctions. These junctions are central to the device's ability to control current flow.
In an N-channel JFET, the structure consists of N-type material forming the channel on a P-type substrate, with the gate...

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) is a science-based, preventive system used globally to ensure food safety by identifying, evaluating, and controlling biological, chemical, and physical hazards throughout food production. Originally developed by NASA and the Pillsbury Company for astronaut food, HACCP is now a core component of the Codex Alimentarius.HACCP operates on prerequisite programs—such as Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs), sanitation procedures, and supplier...

Lumber Defects

Lumber Defects

Lumber defects, which can affect both the appearance and structural integrity of wood, include a variety of growth and manufacturing flaws. Growth defects such as knots and knotholes occur where branches were once attached to the tree trunk, with knotholes forming when these knots fall out. Other natural defects include decay and insect damage, which compromise the wood's strength and durability.
Shakes are minor fractures that run along or across the wood's annual rings, while wane is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

weHelp: A Reference Architecture for Social Recommender Systems.

IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering workshops. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering·2014

Same author

Testing and Validating Machine Learning Classifiers by Metamorphic Testing.

The Journal of systems and software·2011

Same author

Application of Metamorphic Testing to Supervised Classifiers.

Proceedings. International Conference on Quality Software·2011

Same author

Automatic Detection of Previously-Unseen Application States for Deployment Environment Testing and Analysis.

Proceedings of the ... International Workshop on Automation of Software Test. International Workshop on Automation of Software Test·2011

Same author

CONFU: Configuration Fuzzing Testing Framework for Software Vulnerability Detection.

International journal of secure software engineering·2010

Same author

Reduction of tumor necrosis factor induced nuclear factor-kappaB nuclear translocation and DNA binding by dexamethasone in human osteoarthritic synovial tissue explants.

The Journal of rheumatology·2002

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

Configuration Fuzzing for Software Vulnerability Detection.

Huning Dai, Christian Murphy, Gail Kaiser

Proceedings. International Conference on Availability, Security, and Reliability

|April 5, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Configuration fuzzing enhances software security by randomly modifying application configurations during runtime to uncover hidden vulnerabilities. This method ensures thorough testing without impacting the live application, improving overall system resilience.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

Area of Science:

Software Engineering
Computer Security

Background:

Software vulnerabilities often depend on specific configurations and runtime environments.
Traditional fuzz testing lacks guarantees on input validity and exploration coverage.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce a novel testing methodology, configuration fuzzing, for detecting condition-specific software vulnerabilities.
To address limitations of conventional fuzz testing regarding input space exploration and validity.

Main Methods:

Configuration fuzzing randomly modifies application configurations at execution points.
Testing is performed in a duplicated process to avoid altering the live application state.
Security invariants are continuously monitored for violations indicating vulnerabilities.

Main Results:

A prototype framework for configuration fuzzing was developed.
A case study demonstrated the efficiency of the configuration fuzzing approach.
The technique effectively identifies vulnerabilities arising from specific software and environment conditions.

Conclusions:

Configuration fuzzing offers a robust method for uncovering elusive software security vulnerabilities.
The approach enhances software reliability by testing under dynamic, real-world conditions.
This technique provides a valuable addition to the software security testing toolkit.