Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Murine Model of Controlled Cortical Impact for the Induction of Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: August 16, 2019
Mild traumatic brain injury: improving quality of care in the paediatric emergency department setting
Sarah Sharpe1, Bridget Kool, Michael Shepherd
1Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Insights
Childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI) care in emergency departments (EDs) shows good acute management but lacks systematic follow-up for mild TBI (MTBI), increasing disability risks.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Neurotrauma
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
Background:
- Childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses significant risks for mortality and long-term disability.
- Mild TBI (MTBI) requires careful management to prevent adverse outcomes.
- Emergency departments (EDs) are critical points for initial TBI assessment and care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the adherence of ED healthcare quality indicators to clinical guidelines for pediatric mild TBI (MTBI) management.
- To identify gaps in the documentation and systematic application of care processes for children with MTBI.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of clinical records for 60 pediatric patients discharged from an ED after head injury.
- Analysis of care processes and follow-up documentation.
- Stratification of patient sample by ethnicity and age group.
Main Results:
- Acute care processes for identifying and managing life-threatening complications (e.g., CT scans for intracranial hemorrhage) aligned with best practices.
- Gaps were identified in systematically applying clinical criteria to identify and follow up children with definite or possible MTBI.
- While relevant clinical criteria were documented, their systematic use in patient management was inconsistent.
Conclusions:
- The lack of a systematic approach to MTBI diagnosis and follow-up in pediatric EDs represents a missed opportunity to mitigate disability risks.
- There is a need for improved integrated care pathways to enhance the identification, documentation, and follow-up of pediatric MTBI cases.
- Enhanced attention to systematic care is required to minimize long-term disability from MTBI in children.
Aim:
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) in childhood can impose a significant threat to life and longer-term disability. This study investigated the extent to which the documentation of key indicators of healthcare quality in the emergency department (ED) setting was consistent with clinical guidelines for the management of children with mild TBI (MTBI).
Methods:
The clinical records of a random sample of 60 children (stratified by ethnicity and age group), who were seen and discharged from a large metropolitan paediatric hospital ED following a head injury, were systematically reviewed to examine the processes of care and follow-up.
Results:
Based on the documentation in clinical records, processes designed to identify and manage potentially life-threatening acute complications (e.g. computed tomography scanning to identify intracranial haemorrhage) were consistent with best practice standards. However gaps existed between current and best practice for some aspects of care that could minimise risks of longer-term disability from MTBI. For example, relevant clinical criteria were well documented, but this information did not appear to be applied systematically to identify and to follow up children with definite or possible MTBI.
Conclusion:
The apparent absence of a systematic approach to the diagnosis and follow-up of MTBI in children presenting to ED suggests a missed opportunity to minimise the risk of disability following these injuries. Greater attention to an integrated care pathway that improves the identification, documentation, and follow-up of children with MTBI presenting to ED is required.

