Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Development of a Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Rat Model
Published on: August 17, 2022
Outcome and cost analysis of sacral nerve modulation for treating urinary and/or fecal incontinence
Anne-Marie Leroi1, Xavier Lenne, Benoît Dervaux
1ADEN EA/IFR MP, Rouen University Hospital, France. annemarie.leroi@chu-rouen.fr
Background:
Sacral nerve modulation (SNM) is an established treatment for urinary and fecal incontinence in patients for whom conservative management has failed.
Objective:
This study assessed the outcome and cost analysis of SNM compared to alternative medical and surgical treatments.
Methods:
Clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness analyses were performed in parallel with a prospective, multicenter cohort study that included 369 consecutive patients with urge urinary and/or fecal incontinence. The duration of follow-up was 24 months, and costs were estimated from the national health perspective. Cost-effectiveness outcomes were expressed as incremental costs per 50% of improved severity scores (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio).
Results:
The SNM significantly improved the continence status (P < 0.005) and quality of life (P < 0.05) of patients with urge urinary and/or fecal incontinence compared to alternative treatments. The average cost of SNM for urge urinary incontinence was ∈8525 (95% confidence interval, ∈6686-∈10,364; P = 0.001) more for the first 2 years compared to alternative treatments. The corresponding increase in cost for subjects with fecal incontinence was ∈6581 (95% confidence interval, ∈2077-∈11,084; P = 0.006). When an improvement of more than 50% in the continence severity score was used as the unit of effectiveness, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for SNM was ∈94,204 and ∈185,160 at 24 months of follow-up for urinary and fecal incontinence, respectively.
Conclusions:
The SNM is a cost-effective treatment for urge urinary and/or fecal incontinence.