Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

08:54
A Workflow to Quantitatively Determine Age-Related Macular Degeneration Lesion-Specific Variations in Fundus Autofluorescence
Published on: May 26, 2023
Measuring visual function in age-related macular degeneration with frequency-doubling (matrix) perimetry
Andrew John Anderson1, Chris A Johnson, John S Werner
1Department of Optometry & Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. aaj@unimelb.edu.au
Summary
The Humphrey Matrix 10-2 test shows good agreement with the Humphrey Field Analyzer 10-2 for assessing visual field defects in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Both tests effectively quantify central visual field loss in AMD patients.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Devices
- Visual Psychophysics
Background:
- Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of vision loss, primarily affecting central vision.
- Accurate assessment of visual field defects is crucial for managing AMD and monitoring disease progression.
- The Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 10-2 is a standard tool, but newer perimeters like the Humphrey Matrix 10-2 offer potential advantages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the agreement between the Humphrey Matrix perimeter 10-2 and the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 10-2.
- To determine the reliability of the Matrix 10-2 in assessing visual function in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Main Methods:
- Forty-two eyes of 42 AMD patients were tested using both the Matrix 10-2 and HFA 10-2 visual field tests.
- Key metrics including Mean Deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation, and test time were recorded.
- Spatial concordance between the two tests was calculated by comparing the classification (normal vs. abnormal) of individual test locations.
Main Results:
- Both MD and pattern standard deviation showed strong correlations between the Matrix 10-2 and HFA 10-2 (r²=0.79 and r²=0.80, respectively).
- Median spatial concordance was 0.76, indicating similar spatial quantification of visual field defects.
- Fixation loss was significantly lower with the Matrix 10-2 (0%) compared to the HFA 10-2 (7%).
Conclusions:
- The Humphrey Matrix 10-2 test demonstrates comparable performance to the HFA 10-2 in quantifying central visual field loss in AMD.
- The Matrix 10-2 offers a reliable method for assessing visual function in AMD patients.
- Visual acuity alone provides only a modest prediction of the extent and depth of visual field defects in AMD.

