Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

The Uncertainty Principle

The Uncertainty Principle

Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

Probability Laws

Probability Laws

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Legal Decision Biases in GPT: A Comparison with Human Judgment.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

Divergent patterns of probabilistic reasoning in humans and GPT-5.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same author

Attentional dynamics explain the elusive nature of context effects.

Psychological review·2026

Same author

Incorporating episodic memory into quantum models of judgement and decision.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2025

Same author

Preface (Part I): quantum theory and topology in models of decision making.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2025

Same author

An overview of the quantum cognition research program.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025

Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026

Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026

Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026

Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026

Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026

Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.

Jerome R Busemeyer¹, Emmanuel M Pothos, Riccardo Franco

¹Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. jbusemey@indiana.edu

Psychological Review

|April 13, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a quantum probability model to explain human judgment errors like conjunction fallacies. Quantum principles offer a novel framework for understanding cognitive biases in probability estimation.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Quantum Physics
Decision Theory

Background:

Human probability judgments often deviate from classical probability theory, exhibiting systematic errors.
Existing models struggle to fully explain phenomena like conjunction and disjunction fallacies.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce and validate a quantum probability model for human judgment.
To explain common cognitive biases in probability estimation using quantum principles.

Main Methods:

Developed a quantum probability model based on vector spaces and generalized axioms.
Compared quantum model predictions with empirical data on judgment errors.
Contrasted the quantum model with established cognitive models like anchoring and adjustment.

Main Results:

The quantum model successfully explains conjunction fallacies, disjunction fallacies, averaging effects, unpacking effects, and order effects.
Introduced the concept of question compatibility/incompatibility influencing sequential judgments.
Quantum probability provides a more comprehensive explanation than traditional models.

Conclusions:

Quantum information-processing principles offer a viable new framework for understanding human judgment and reasoning.
The quantum model provides a unified explanation for diverse judgment errors.
Further research into quantum cognition is warranted.