Universal neonatal audiological screening: experience of the University Hospital of Pisa

Paolo Ghirri1, Annalisa Liumbruno, Sara Lunardi

  • 1Mother and Child Department, Neonatology Unit and Section of Neonatal Endocrinology and Dysmorphology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. pghirri@med.unipi.it

Insights

Early hearing screening for babies is crucial. Universal neonatal audiological screening programs using Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Automatic Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) effectively identify hearing impairment in newborns.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal screening
  • Audiology
  • Public health

Background:

  • Early identification of pre-lingual deafness is vital for minimizing long-term communication deficits.
  • International guidelines recommend deafness diagnosis by three months and hearing aid treatment by six months, with cochlear implants between 12-18 months.
  • Progressive or late-onset hearing loss affects 20-30% of infants, necessitating audiological follow-up programs, especially for high-risk infants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a universal newborn hearing screening program implemented at the University hospital of Pisa.
  • To assess the incidence of hearing impairment and the rate of false-positives in the screened population.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of universal newborn hearing screening using Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Automatic Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR).
  • Screening followed Tuscany guidelines based on the 2007 JCIH Position Statement, adapted for regional needs.
  • Data collected from November 2005 to April 2009, including 8113 neonates.

Main Results:

  • Out of 8113 neonates, 93.9% underwent TEOAE, and 6.1% with risk factors underwent both TEOAE and AABR.
  • 84 patients (1.04%) failed both tests, with 44 (0.54%) identified as false positives.
  • 34 neonates (4.2 ‰) were diagnosed with hearing impairment, including 8 (0.99 ‰) with unilateral and 26 (3.2 ‰) with bilateral hearing loss.

Conclusions:

  • The screening program demonstrated a low false-positive rate (0.54%) and identified a significant incidence of bilateral hearing loss (3.2 ‰).
  • Premature birth and neonatal distress were identified as primary causes of hearing loss in the studied population.
  • The study supports the necessity of universal neonatal hearing screening and audiological follow-up for early intervention.

Related Concept Videos