Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories.

D J Burns1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Lafayette College, Easton, Pennsylvania 18042.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|November 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The bizarre imagery effect and intention to learn.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Compensator design for improved counterbalancing in high speed atomic force microscopy.

The Review of scientific instruments·2011
Same author

Receptor reporter systems.

Current protocols in pharmacology·2011
Same author

Indirect identification and compensation of lateral scanner resonances in atomic force microscopes.

Nanotechnology·2011
Same author

Photoaffinity detection of cAMP binding proteins in ovarian cancer.

Methods in molecular medicine·2011
Same author

Screening for inhibitors of histone deacetylase by incorporating a spraying method to micro-arrayed compound screening.

Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening·2004
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

The generation effect, where internally generated items are better remembered, depends on list structure. A multifactor account is necessary to explain these memory recall findings.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research
  • Human Cognition

Background:

  • The generation effect describes enhanced memory for self-generated information compared to presented information.
  • Existing theories propose single-factor (relational or response processing) or multifactor (both) explanations.
  • The influence of categorical structure on the generation effect is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether single-factor or multifactor accounts better explain the generation effect.
  • To examine the role of categorical structure in modulating the generation effect across different memory tasks.
  • To provide empirical evidence for the necessity of a multifactorial explanation.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments involved participants reading or generating responses from lists with varying degrees of categorical structure.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Memory performance was assessed using free recall, cued recall, and recognition tasks.
  • A fourth experiment was conducted to rule out alternative interpretations of the observed data.

    • Main Results:

    • With minimal categorical structure, significant generation effects were found for free recall and recognition, but not cued recall.
    • With high categorical structure, a generation effect emerged for cued recall but was absent in recognition and free recall.
    • These pattern differences suggest a complex interplay between generation, categorical structure, and recall type.

    Conclusions:

    • A single-factor account is insufficient to explain the observed pattern of results.
    • The findings strongly support a multifactor account, indicating that generation involves multiple processing types.
    • The interaction between categorical structure and processing type is crucial for understanding the generation effect in memory.