Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Bone grafting the mandible.

Patrick J Louis1

  • 1Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1919 7th Avenue South, SDB 419, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. plouis@uab.edu

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America
|April 16, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Cross-Sectional Study Examining Andrews' Analysis in Caucasian and African American Subjects.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2024
Same author

Recurrent central odontogenic fibroma in a patient with nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome: case report and in vitro analysis.

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology·2024
Same author

Does the Levasseur-Merrill Retractor Provide Reliable In Vivo Guidance for the Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy?

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2022
Same author

An Evaluation of Jaw Tracking Movements in Patients with Total Joint Replacements versus a Control Group.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2022
Same author

Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2020
Same author

Outcomes and Survivorship of Biomet Microfixation Total Joint Replacement System: Results From an FDA Postmarket Study.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2020
Same journal

Anatomy and Spread of Gingivobuccal Cancers.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Gingivobuccal Cancers: Demographics and Geographic Variations.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Unilateral Cleft Lip: Primary Repair.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Advances in Reconstructive Surgery for Gingivobuccal Cancers.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Etiology and Pathogenesis of Gingivobuccal Cancers.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Nuances of Perioperative Therapy in Gingivobuccal Cancers.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

This review explores diverse bone grafting methods for mandibular reconstruction. It examines the necessity of autogenous bone and the role of membranes in ridge augmentation.

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Mandibular defects require effective reconstruction for function and aesthetics.
  • Various bone grafting techniques exist, each with specific indications.
  • The use of membranes and autogenous bone is debated in mandibular ridge reconstruction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively review current bone grafting techniques for mandibular defects.
  • To evaluate the necessity of autogenous bone in mandibular ridge reconstruction.
  • To discuss the significance of membranes in bone regeneration for the mandible.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of bone grafting techniques for mandibular reconstruction.
  • Analysis of studies comparing different grafting materials and membrane use.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

  • Discussion of clinical outcomes and challenges in mandibular augmentation.

    • Main Results:

    • Multiple bone grafting options are available for partially dentate and edentulous mandibles.
    • The necessity of autogenous bone versus allogeneic or synthetic materials requires careful consideration.
    • Membranes play a crucial role in guided bone regeneration, enhancing ridge preservation.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of bone grafting technique depends on the specific defect and patient factors.
    • Autogenous bone remains a reliable option, but alternatives are evolving.
    • Membrane technology is vital for predictable outcomes in mandibular reconstruction and augmentation.