Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026
09:07
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
The illusion of certainty--a deluded perception?
1Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. jp.sturmberg@gmail.com
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|April 19, 2011
Summary
Science embraces doubt, yet humans seek certainty. This study explores how to reconcile scientific inquiry with the desire for assured knowledge, expanding understanding in key areas.
Area of Science:
- Epistemology
- Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Science
Background:
- Science inherently involves doubt and openness to alternative explanations.
- Human desire for certainty provides comfort and security.
- Reconciling scientific doubt with the human need for certainty is a key challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the coexistence of scientific doubt and the human desire for certainty.
- To investigate how perception influences our understanding and knowledge acquisition.
- To expand the boundaries of 'common certainty' across various scientific domains.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of perceptual processes and their role in knowledge formation.
- Examination of how prior experiences shape current understanding.
- Exploration of how mismatches in perception lead to new learning and awareness.
Main Results:
- Perception is subjective, shaped by stored experiences and predictive mechanisms.
- New awareness and learning arise from significant discrepancies between expected and received sensory input.
- Individuals often operate within self-imposed cognitive boundaries.
Conclusions:
- Awareness of cognitive limitations can foster intellectual expansion.
- The presented papers aim to broaden 'common certainty' in statistical interpretation, patient management, disease management, and health policy.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Magical Thinking
Magical thinking encompasses the belief in assumptions that defy logical reasoning yet appear intuitively convincing. It is a common psychological phenomenon that persists across various cultural and individual contexts. While these assumptions contradict empirical evidence and scientific laws, they often serve meaningful psychological roles in promoting emotional resilience and a sense of control, especially under stress or uncertainty.Thought-Action Fusion and the Law of SimilarityA key...
01:12Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
01:30Unrealistic Optimism Bias
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
01:53Cause and Effect
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
01:34Groupthink
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
01:37Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...