Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Single center experience with transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN™ Valve
Hans Henrik Møller Nielsen1, Leif Thuesen, Henrik Egeblad
1Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark. hhmn@kirurgi.org
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) offers significant functional improvement for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. A learning curve was observed, with a decrease in 30-day mortality over time, indicating improved outcomes with experience.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) emerged in the early 2000s for high-risk aortic stenosis patients unsuitable for surgery.
- TAVI procedures have significantly increased, with widespread adoption in cardiac centers.
- This study details a single center's initial experience with 100 TAVI procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of the first 100 transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures at a single center.
- To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of TAVI in high-risk patients.
- To identify any learning curve associated with TAVI implementation.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 100 patients undergoing either transfemoral (F-TAVI) or transapical (A-TAVI) implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN™ valve.
- Patient selection based on predicted high risk for conventional surgery and iliac artery diameter.
- Data collected on procedural success, mortality, complications, and functional status.
Main Results:
- Successful implantation in 92% of patients; 30-day mortality was 8%, decreasing from 12% to 4% over the study period.
- Major non-fatal complications occurred in 5% of A-TAVI patients versus 0% in F-TAVI patients.
- Significant improvement in NYHA class (from 2.9 to 1.8, p < 0.001) was observed, with no difference between F-TAVI and A-TAVI.
Conclusions:
- TAVI is a viable option for high-risk patients, offering acceptable mortality and morbidity with substantial functional gains.
- The observed reduction in 30-day mortality suggests a learning curve, highlighting the importance of experience in TAVI programs.
- Both transfemoral and transapical approaches demonstrated functional improvement, though complication rates differed between the two methods.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization