Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Patients' perspectives on end-of-life issues and implantable cardioverter defibrillators
Patricia H Strachan1, Sandra L Carroll, Sonya de Laat
1McMaster University, School of Nursing, HSC 2J20D, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5. strachan@mcmaster.ca
Insights
Patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention often prioritize SCD prevention over other end-of-life concerns. Integrating ICDs into advance care planning is recommended.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Ethics
- Patient Experience
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are increasingly used for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD).
- Understanding patient perspectives on end-of-life issues related to ICDs is crucial for comprehensive care.
- Limited research exists on how patients perceive ICDs in the context of their overall end-of-life planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore patients' perspectives on end-of-life issues concerning implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).
- To understand how patients weigh the benefits of ICDs against quality of life and preferred modes of death.
- To identify implications for advance care planning and healthcare professional education.
Main Methods:
- A grounded theory approach was employed.
- Semi-structured, audiotaped interviews were conducted with 30 participants (24 ICD recipients, 6 decliners) from two ICD referral centers.
- Data analysis involved interview transcripts, verification, researcher memos, literature review, and demographic analysis using NVivo7.
Main Results:
- Participants were predominantly male, had comorbidities, ejection fraction <30%, and ranged in age from 26 to 87.
- Three main themes emerged: quality versus quantity of life, preferred mode of death, and technical realities of the ICD.
- Most participants focused on SCD prevention, with less emphasis on implications for death from other causes.
Conclusions:
- Patients consider ICDs in the context of both life quantity and quality.
- There is a strong patient advocacy for incorporating ICDs into advance care planning discussions.
- Findings highlight the need for improved advance care planning and healthcare professional education regarding ICDs and end-of-life care.
Abstract:
Increasing numbers of cardiovascular patients are receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). This report examines patients' perspectives on related end-of-life issues. Using a grounded theory approach, audiotaped, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 30 participants from two ICD referral centres in southwestern Ontario (24 who accepted an ICD and 6 who declined). Interview transcripts, verification with interviewees, researcher memos, published literature, and participant demographics were analyzed using NVivo7. Most participants were male, had comorbidities and an ejection fraction of less than 30 percent, and ranged in age from 26 to 87. Consensus was reached by three research team members on three main themes: quality versus quantity of life, preferred mode of death, and the technical realities of the ICD. The ICD was considered in relation to both quantity and quality of life. Most participants focused on the prevention of SCD, not the implications of the ICD for death by any other cause. Participants advocated for incorporating the ICD into advance care planning. Our findings have implications for the development of advance care plans and education of health professionals.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Ethical Dilemmas II
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management