Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Preparation of Nanoparticles for ToF-SIMS and XPS Analysis
Published on: September 13, 2020
Comparison of Bi(1), Bi(3) and C(60) primary ion sources for ToF-SIMS imaging of patterned protein samples
Manish Dubey1, J Brison, David W Grainger
1National ESCA and Surface Analysis Center for Biomedical Problems, Box 351750, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1750 USA.
Abstract:
Imaging time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) has been used to study protein bound to a photolithographically-patterned, commercial poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based polymer film. The effect of different ion sources on the fragmentation pattern from this sample was analyzed with respect to the surface sensitivity of characteristic protein fragments and contrast in the ion images. The method demonstrates that, under similar fluence (below the static limit), Bi(3) (+) provides better surface sensitivity for low mass fragments and the best image contrast as compared to Bi(1) (+) and C(60) (+) cluster sources. Principal component analysis (PCA) was utilized to process depth profiles for this sample and shows that a primary ion fluence of approximately 20 × 10(12) ions/cm(2) is required to etch through the adsorbed protein layer.
Related Concept Videos
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
Mass Analyzers: Common Types

