Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mesh Analysis for AC Circuits01:12

Mesh Analysis for AC Circuits

In the domain of radio communication, the significance of impedance matching must be considered. It is crucial to ensure the efficient transmission of signals between radio transmitters and receivers. Achieving this balance involves using impedance-matching circuits, with one fundamental configuration comprising a resistor, capacitor, and inductor.
The process of harmonizing these impedances begins with a clear understanding of the input and output signals. Once these signals are known, the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived left atrioventricular coupling index predicts outcome in reduced ejection fraction.

ESC heart failure·2026
Same author

CarDiac magnEtic resonance for prophylactic implantable cardioVerter defibrillAtor ThErapy in ischemic dilated CardioMyopathy: Prognostic implication of papillary muscles involvement.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
Same author

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes: a clinical appraisal of diagnostic accuracy and molecular utility.

Current medical research and opinion·2026
Same author

Anatomical severity of Ebstein's anomaly: a quantitative analysis based on cardiovascular MRI.

Open heart·2026
Same author

Magnetic resonance array square coils: Dependence of the frequency and sample conductivity on decoupling.

The Review of scientific instruments·2026
Same author

Prognostic role of myocardial storage, hypertrophy, and inflammation/fibrosis in Fabry cardiomyopathy: a new predictive score including T1 values.

European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes·2025
Same journal

Reconstruction of MRI from undersampled k-spaces of double-contrast volume acquisitions using deep neural networks.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Radiofrequency-induced heating safety of brain MRI scans at 7 T in the presence of a shoulder implant.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Incremental diagnostic value of microstructural time-dependent diffusion MRI in differentiating PCNSL from glioblastoma over conventional MRI.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Enhanced motion compensation for free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with GROG-facilitated bunch phase encoding and Golden angle radial sampling.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

The allegory of the cave: 10 years of AI shadows in radiology.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Conversion of 3 T liver, spleen, pancreas, and kidney R2* measurements to 1.5 T R2* equivalents: Validation of a theoretical framework.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Frequency Mixing Magnetic Detection Scanner for Imaging Magnetic Particles in Planar Samples
07:01

Frequency Mixing Magnetic Detection Scanner for Imaging Magnetic Particles in Planar Samples

Published on: June 9, 2016

B(1)(+)/actual flip angle and reception sensitivity mapping methods: simulation and comparison.

Valentina Hartwig1, Nicola Vanello, Giulio Giovannetti

  • 1Institute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy. valeh@ifc.cnr.it

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|April 29, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging requires mapping the B(1)(+) transmission field and reception sensitivity. This study quantitatively compares the double-angle method (DAM) and fitting (FIT) methods for improved MR imaging accuracy.

More Related Videos

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Frequency Mixing Magnetic Detection Scanner for Imaging Magnetic Particles in Planar Samples
07:01

Frequency Mixing Magnetic Detection Scanner for Imaging Magnetic Particles in Planar Samples

Published on: June 9, 2016

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Radiofrequency (RF) Engineering
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Accurate knowledge of B(1)(+) transmission field and reception sensitivity maps is crucial for high-field (≥3 T) human MR imaging.
  • RF field inhomogeneities are a key error source in quantitative MR spectroscopy and impact image quality.
  • These maps are vital for post-acquisition correction, RF coil/pulse design, validating electromagnetic models, and assessing biomedical implant compatibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively compare two established methods for B(1)(+) and reception sensitivity mapping: the double-angle method (DAM) and the fitting (FIT) method.
  • To evaluate the performance of DAM and FIT against experimental data and numerical simulations.
  • To provide insights into selecting appropriate methods for accurate MR imaging parameter estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation and application of the double-angle method (DAM) for B(1)(+) and reception sensitivity mapping.
  • Implementation and application of the fitting (FIT) method for B(1)(+) and reception sensitivity mapping.
  • Quantitative comparison of experimental results from DAM and FIT, alongside numerical simulation data.

Main Results:

  • Experimental data from DAM and FIT methods were obtained for B(1)(+) and reception sensitivity mapping.
  • Numerical simulation results were generated to complement experimental findings.
  • A quantitative comparison was performed between the two methods and simulation data, highlighting their relative strengths and weaknesses.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a quantitative comparison of DAM and FIT methods for B(1)(+) and reception sensitivity mapping in MR imaging.
  • Findings aid in understanding the accuracy and applicability of each method for various MR applications.
  • This comparison is essential for advancing quantitative MR techniques and improving image analysis in high-field MRI.