Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Analyzing Mixing Inhomogeneity in a Microfluidic Device by Microscale Schlieren Technique
10:12

Analyzing Mixing Inhomogeneity in a Microfluidic Device by Microscale Schlieren Technique

Published on: June 12, 2015

Micromixing within microfluidic devices.

Lorenzo Capretto1, Wei Cheng, Martyn Hill

  • 1School of Engineering Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Topics in Current Chemistry
|April 29, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surgical outcomes of neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in early breast cancer: meta-analysis.

BJS open·2024
Same author

Temperature Hotspot Detection on Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs) Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves-A Machine Learning Approach.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Bactericidal Effect of Ultrasound-Responsive Microbubbles and Sub-inhibitory Gentamicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms on Substrates With Differing Acoustic Impedance.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2022
Same author

Modelling and Validation of a Guided Acoustic Wave Temperature Monitoring System.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Acoustofluidic device for acoustic capture of Bacillus anthracis spore analogues at low concentration.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021
Same author

Comparing methods for the modelling of boundary-driven streaming in acoustofluidic devices.

Microfluidics and nanofluidics·2020
Same journal

Chemoselectivity and stereoselectivity have been key factors in the development of fine organic synthesis. Introduction.

Topics in current chemistry·2016
Same journal

Hypervalent Iodine-Induced Oxidative Couplings (New Metal-Free Coupling Advances and Their Applications in Natural Product Syntheses).

Topics in current chemistry·2016
Same journal

Halogen Bonding in Hypervalent Iodine Compounds.

Topics in current chemistry·2016
Same journal

Phenol Dearomatization with Hypervalent Iodine Reagents.

Topics in current chemistry·2016
Same journal

Preface.

Topics in current chemistry·2016
Same journal

Preface: solar energy for fuels.

Topics in current chemistry·2016
See all related articles

Micromixing is essential for microfluidic systems. This review covers passive and active microstructured devices, detailing their mechanisms, advantages, and disadvantages for efficient fluid mixing.

Area of Science:

  • Microfluidics
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Micromixing is a critical unit operation in microfluidic systems, including micro total analysis systems (μTAS).
  • Understanding microscale fluid dynamics is key to designing effective micromixing devices.
  • Challenges in microfluidic mixing stem from low Reynolds numbers and limited diffusion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive review of microstructured mixing devices and their underlying mixing phenomena.
  • To classify and discuss various passive and active micromixer designs.
  • To analyze the benefits and drawbacks of microfluidic mixing.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of state-of-the-art microstructured mixing devices.
  • Classification of micromixers based on their mixing principles (passive vs. active).

More Related Videos

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays
18:11

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays

Published on: October 1, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Analyzing Mixing Inhomogeneity in a Microfluidic Device by Microscale Schlieren Technique
10:12

Analyzing Mixing Inhomogeneity in a Microfluidic Device by Microscale Schlieren Technique

Published on: June 12, 2015

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays
18:11

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays

Published on: October 1, 2007

  • Discussion of specific examples within each category, including T- or Y-shaped, parallel lamination, droplet, electrokinetic, and ultrasound-assisted mixers.

    • Main Results:

    • Micromixers are categorized into passive (relying on flow dynamics) and active (using external energy sources).
    • Passive mixers include T- or Y-shaped, parallel lamination, sequential, focusing enhanced, and droplet types.
    • Active mixers utilize external forces like electric fields, pressure, ultrasound, and magnetic fields.

    Conclusions:

    • Both passive and active micromixers offer distinct advantages for enhancing mixing efficiency in microfluidic applications.
    • The choice of micromixer depends on specific application requirements, energy input, and desired mixing performance.
    • Further research into novel designs and optimization of existing micromixers is ongoing.