Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
Purpose of Health Records I01:11

Purpose of Health Records I

The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Purpose of Health Records II01:19

Purpose of Health Records II

Health records serve various essential purposes in the healthcare system. Here are some key purposes:
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
Introduction to Documentation and Reporting01:20

Introduction to Documentation and Reporting

Documentation is the systematic process of formally recording, maintaining, and communicating information.
Nursing documentation records essential information and details regarding a patient's care and treatment in written or electronic form. It is a critical aspect of nursing practice that involves documenting assessments, interventions, outcomes, and other relevant details about a patient's health status.
Documentation maps the patient's health journey by creating a comprehensive and precise...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breaking the cycle: addressing the evolving dynamic of violence associated with the European drug market.

The International journal on drug policy·2026
Same author

A descriptive study of patients diagnosed with cystic fibrosis or a CF-related disorder in adulthood.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same author

Hidden in Plain Sight: Lessons From International Case Studies of Child Sexual Abuse in Early Childhood Education and Care Settings.

Child maltreatment·2026
Same author

"MoveScape": Informing Active Landscape Planning to Improve Physical Activity and Well-Being.

Journal of physical activity & health·2025
Same author

The Need to Revitalise Drug Use Monitoring to Keep Pace With a More Dynamic, Digitally Enabled and Globally Connected Drug Market.

Drug and alcohol review·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "Optimising outcomes for adults with Cystic Fibrosis taking CFTR modulators by individualising care: Personalised data linkage to understand treatment optimisation (PLUTO), a novel clinical framework" [Respirat. Med. 239 (2025)].

Respiratory medicine·2025
Same journal

Letter to the Editor: 'Life expectancy of UK physicians in the early 21st century: An analysis of 1,000 fellows from the Royal College of Physicians' Munk's Roll'.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Finerenone Exposure and Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Prevalence and predictive factors of chronic kidney disease among individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors: A multicenter cross sectional study, North East Ethiopia.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Authors' response to Dr Lucy Williams' letter to the Editor: 'Life expectancy of UK physicians in the early 21st century: An analysis of 1,000 fellows from the Royal College of Physicians' Munk's Roll'.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Resident doctor workforce wellbeing worldwide: lessons between the United Kingdom and Australia.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Premature ventricular complexes.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Implementing an interprofessional patient record.

Paul Griffiths1, Alan Anderson, Clare Coyne

  • 1Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Paul.griffiths3@sth.nhs.uk

Clinical Medicine (London, England)
|April 30, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals implemented an interprofessional patient record (IPPR) system, integrating separate nursing, medical, and therapy records. This project successfully enhanced patient record management and realized key benefits.

More Related Videos

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
07:13

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform

Published on: April 12, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
07:13

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform

Published on: April 12, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Clinical Information Systems
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Historically, patient records at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (STHFT) were profession-specific.
  • Separate records for nursing, medical, and therapy staff led to fragmentation of patient information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the implementation of a unified Interprofessional Patient Record (IPPR) at STHFT.
  • To create a single, integrated patient record accessible to all healthcare staff.

Main Methods:

  • A two-year project commencing May 2008.
  • Involved stakeholder engagement, development of IPPR standards, and a comprehensive education and training program.
  • Utilized staff surveys and clinical audit data for assessment.

Main Results:

  • Successful implementation of the IPPR system.
  • Realization of many anticipated benefits associated with integrated patient records.
  • Positive feedback from staff surveys and clinical audit data.

Conclusions:

  • Key success factors included extensive clinical staff engagement, strong board-level support, a dedicated project team, and broad staff involvement.
  • The IPPR project demonstrated the feasibility and benefits of a unified patient record system in a large NHS Trust.