Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Assay Development for High-Throughput Drug Screening Against Mycobacteria
Published on: October 25, 2024
Gatifloxacin versus chloramphenicol for uncomplicated enteric fever: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial
Amit Arjyal1, Buddha Basnyat, Samir Koirala
1Oxford University Clinical Research Unit-Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Insights
Gatifloxacin offers a shorter treatment duration and fewer adverse events compared to chloramphenicol for enteric fever. While not more effective, it is a preferred option for developing countries.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Tropical Medicine
Background:
- Enteric fever remains a significant public health concern, particularly in developing countries.
- Current treatment options for enteric fever have limitations, including duration and adverse effects.
- Investigating novel and affordable antibiotics is crucial for effective disease management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of gatifloxacin versus chloramphenicol for treating uncomplicated enteric fever in children and adults.
- To determine if gatifloxacin is a superior treatment option for enteric fever.
- To evaluate secondary outcomes such as fever clearance time, relapse rates, and adverse events.
Main Methods:
- An open-label, randomized superiority trial was conducted involving 844 patients diagnosed with enteric fever.
- Participants received either gatifloxacin (7-day course) or chloramphenicol (14-day course).
- The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined by persistent fever, need for rescue treatment, microbiological failure, relapse, or complications.
Main Results:
- Treatment failure rates were similar between the gatifloxacin (12/177) and chloramphenicol (14/175) groups (HR 0.86, p=0.70).
- Median fever clearance time was comparable: 3.90 days for gatifloxacin and 3.95 days for chloramphenicol.
- Gatifloxacin group experienced fewer adverse events (14%) compared to the chloramphenicol group (24%).
Conclusions:
- Gatifloxacin is not more efficacious than chloramphenicol for treating uncomplicated enteric fever.
- Gatifloxacin is recommended as the preferred treatment due to its shorter duration and improved safety profile.
- This finding has significant implications for enteric fever management in resource-limited settings.
Background:
We aimed to investigate whether gatifloxacin, a new generation and affordable fluoroquinolone, is better than chloramphenicol for the treatment of uncomplicated enteric fever in children and adults.
Methods:
We did an open-label randomised superiority trial at Patan Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, to investigate whether gatifloxacin is more effective than chloramphenicol for treating uncomplicated enteric fever. Children and adults clinically diagnosed with enteric fever received either gatifloxacin (10 mg/kg) once a day for 7 days, or chloramphenicol (75 mg/kg per day) in four divided doses for 14 days. Patients were randomly allocated treatment (1:1) in blocks of 50, without stratification. Allocations were placed in sealed envelopes opened by the study physician once a patient was enrolled into the trial. Masking was not possible because of the different formulations and ways of giving the two drugs. The primary outcome measure was treatment failure, which consisted of at least one of the following: persistent fever at day 10, need for rescue treatment, microbiological failure, relapse until day 31, and enteric-fever-related complications. The primary outcome was assessed in all patients randomly allocated treatment and reported separately for culture-positive patients and for all patients. Secondary outcome measures were fever clearance time, late relapse, and faecal carriage. The trial is registered on controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN 53258327.
Findings:
844 patients with a median age of 16 (IQR 9-22) years were enrolled in the trial and randomly allocated a treatment. 352 patients had blood-culture-confirmed enteric fever: 175 were treated with chloramphenicol and 177 with gatifloxacin. 14 patients had treatment failure in the chloramphenicol group, compared with 12 in the gatifloxacin group (hazard ratio [HR] of time to failure 0·86, 95% CI 0·40-1·86, p=0·70). The median time to fever clearance was 3·95 days (95% CI 3·68-4·68) in the chloramphenicol group and 3·90 days (3·58-4·27) in the gatifloxacin group (HR 1·06, 0·86-1·32, p=0·59). At 1 month only, three of 148 patients were stool-culture positive in the chloramphenicol group and none in the gatifloxacin group. At the end of 3 months only one person had a positive stool culture in the chloramphenicol group. There were no other positive stool cultures even at the end of 6 months. Late relapses were noted in three of 175 patients in the culture-confirmed chloramphenicol group and two of 177 in the gatifloxacin group. There were no culture-positive relapses after day 62. 99 patients (24%) experienced 168 adverse events in the chloramphenicol group and 59 (14%) experienced 73 events in the gatifloxacin group.
Interpretation:
Although no more efficacious than chloramphenicol, gatifloxacin should be the preferred treatment for enteric fever in developing countries because of its shorter treatment duration and fewer adverse events.
Funding:
Wellcome Trust.
Related Concept Videos
Inhibitors of Bacterial DNA Synthesis
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Acute Pyelonephritis I: Introduction
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy
