Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

Experimental Designs

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...

Factorial Design

Factorial Design

Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...

Study Design in Statistics

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...

Crossover Experiments

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Behaviour support in dentistry: A Delphi study to agree terminology in behaviour management.

Community dentistry and oral epidemiology·2024

Same author

Effects of a Contingency for Quiz Accuracy on Exam Scores.

Behavior analysis in practice·2018

Same author

Correction to: Effects of a Contingency for Quiz Accuracy on Exam Scores.

Behavior analysis in practice·2018

Same author

The Use of Behavioral Skills Training to Teach Graph Analysis to Community Based Teachers.

Behavior analysis in practice·2017

Same author

The effects of pairing non-preferred staff with preferred stimuli on increasing the reinforcing value of non-preferred staff attention.

Research in developmental disabilities·2014

Same author

The effects of in-service training alone and in-service training with feedback on data collection accuracy for direct-care staff working with individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Research in developmental disabilities·2014

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

Component analyses using single-subject experimental designs: a review.

John Ward-Horner¹, Peter Sturmey

¹The Graduate Center and Queens College, City University of New York, USA. wardhornerj@yahoo.com

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

|May 5, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Component analysis systematically assesses treatment package components. While most studies identified necessary components, few evaluated their sufficiency, highlighting a need for improved experimental designs in behavioral analysis.

Keywords:

behavior analysis behavior modification component analysis experimental design

More Related Videos

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

A Within-subjects Experimental Protocol to Assess the Effects of Social Input on Infant EEG

A Within-subjects Experimental Protocol to Assess the Effects of Social Input on Infant EEG

Published on: May 3, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

A Within-subjects Experimental Protocol to Assess the Effects of Social Input on Infant EEG

A Within-subjects Experimental Protocol to Assess the Effects of Social Input on Infant EEG

Published on: May 3, 2017

Area of Science:

Behavioral science
Experimental psychology
Research methodology

Background:

Component analysis is crucial for dissecting treatment packages in behavioral research.
Existing literature offers limited detailed guidance on conducting component analyses.
A clear understanding and standardized evaluation method are needed.

Purpose of the Study:

To define component analysis and its significance in behavioral research.
To introduce a novel notation system for evaluating component analysis experimental designs.
To review existing literature to identify trends and limitations in component analysis studies.

Main Methods:

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies employing component analysis.
Thirty relevant articles were analyzed for their methodologies and findings.
A new notation system was developed to assess the rigor of experimental designs.

Main Results:

The majority of reviewed studies successfully identified a necessary component of a treatment package.
However, most studies failed to adequately assess the sufficiency of the identified necessary component.
The application of the proposed notation system can aid in designing more robust studies.

Conclusions:

Component analyses are vital for understanding treatment effectiveness by isolating key variables.
There is a need for more rigorous evaluation of both necessity and sufficiency of components.
The developed notation system offers a framework for enhancing the design and interpretation of component analysis studies.