Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
Published on: January 31, 2014
Incurred sample accuracy assessment: design of experiments based on standard addition
1QPS Netherlands, Bioanalysis & Drug Metabolism, Petrus Campersingel 123, Groningen, The Netherlands.
This study introduces standard addition experiments to assess systematic errors in bioanalytical methods, improving pharmacokinetic data accuracy. This approach enhances Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) bioanalysis for more reliable drug development.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Pharmacokinetics
- Bioanalysis
Background:
- Random and systematic analytical errors impact bioanalytical data quality and pharmacokinetic parameter precision/accuracy.
- Current Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) bioanalysis primarily addresses random errors through reanalysis of incurred samples.
- Systematic errors, affecting method trueness and data accuracy, are less attended in current GLP bioanalysis guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and illustrate a method for assessing systematic errors in GLP bioanalysis.
- To enhance the accuracy and trueness of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from bioanalytical data.
- To extend current GLP bioanalysis guidelines with a focus on systematic error evaluation.
Main Methods:
- Application of standard addition experiments to quantify relative systematic errors.
- Estimation of incurred sample accuracy using the standard addition approach.
- Illustration of the method using bioanalytical data from a bioequivalence study of alendronate.
Main Results:
- The standard addition method provides an estimate for incurred sample accuracy.
- The proposed approach can identify and quantify systematic errors in bioanalytical methods.
- The accuracy of bioanalytical results for alendronate was assessed using this novel approach.
Conclusions:
- Standard addition experiments are a valuable extension to current GLP bioanalysis guidelines for assessing systematic errors.
- Implementing this method can lead to more precise and accurate pharmacokinetic parameters.
- This approach contributes to improved data quality and reliability in drug development and bioequivalence studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Lab
Solutions containing organic solvents, such as low-molecular-mass alcohols, esters, or ketones, enhance absorbances by increasing nebulizer...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Random and Systematic Errors

