Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026
08:01
Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide
Published on: June 28, 2019
Removal processes for arsenic in constructed wetlands
Katherine Lizama A1, Tim D Fletcher, Guangzhi Sun
1Department of Civil Engineering, Building 60, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia. katherine.lizama@monash.edu
Chemosphere
|May 10, 2011
Summary
Constructed wetlands effectively remove toxic arsenic from water. Microbial activity and environmental factors significantly influence arsenic removal efficiency in these natural systems.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Water Treatment Engineering
- Geochemistry
Background:
- Arsenic contamination in aquatic environments poses significant risks to human health and ecosystems.
- Constructed wetlands offer a sustainable and cost-effective approach for removing various pollutants, including arsenic.
- Understanding arsenic removal mechanisms in wetlands is crucial for developing effective water treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current knowledge on arsenic removal processes in constructed wetlands.
- To discuss the implications of these processes for the design and operation of treatment wetlands.
- To identify knowledge gaps and future research directions for optimizing arsenic removal.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of existing studies on arsenic removal in constructed wetlands.
- Analysis of factors influencing arsenic speciation and transformation within wetland environments.
- Evaluation of the roles of sorption, precipitation, coprecipitation, and microbial mediation in arsenic removal.
Main Results:
- Arsenic removal in wetlands is primarily driven by sorption, precipitation, and coprecipitation.
- Microbial communities play a significant role in mediating arsenic removal processes.
- Key factors influencing arsenic speciation include pH, alkalinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and the presence of other chemical species (e.g., iron, sulfur, phosphate).
Conclusions:
- Constructed wetlands show promise for arsenic remediation, but their effectiveness is highly dependent on environmental conditions and microbial activity.
- Further research is needed to elucidate the complex interactions between different removal processes and to develop robust design guidelines for arsenic treatment wetlands.
- Advanced techniques for studying microbial communities and arsenic speciation in the solid phase are recommended for future investigations.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Microbial Wastewater Treatment
Microbial communities in aquatic ecosystems play a key role in the natural breakdown of contaminants introduced through domestic and industrial effluents. Acting as biological catalysts, these microbes change and mineralize a wide range of organic and inorganic pollutants under different redox conditions.In oxygen-rich surface waters, aerobic heterotrophs lead organic matter breakdown, using oxygen as the terminal electron acceptor to efficiently oxidize substrates to carbon dioxide and water.
01:30Biological Treatment of Effluent and Waste Water
Biological wastewater treatment relies on the metabolic activity of microorganisms to remove pollutants from sewage. In modern treatment systems, this process is organized into sequential stages that progressively reduce solid material, dissolved organic matter, and microbial contamination. Each stage plays a distinct role in improving water quality and preparing the effluent for safe discharge or reuse.Primary and Secondary TreatmentPrimary treatment is a physical process that removes large...
01:25Microbial Bioremediation of Uranium
Microorganisms play a critical role in the transformation and immobilization of uranium in contaminated environments through four main pathways: bioreduction, biosorption, bioaccumulation, and biomineralization. These mechanisms reduce uranium’s toxicity and prevent its migration through groundwater systems, offering sustainable approaches for in situ bioremediation.Bioreduction of UraniumBioreduction is driven by anaerobic bacteria such as certain strains of Geobacter and Shewanella, which use...
01:26Enhanced Elimination of Poison
Poison can be effectively removed from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract through various decontamination procedures.
Antidotes serve a crucial role in counteracting the effects of poison by inhibiting enzymes responsible for producing harmful drug metabolites. In some cases, these toxic metabolites can be neutralized by endogenous cosubstrates, which are maintained at specific concentrations to prevent interaction with cellular macromolecules and subsequent cell death.
Renal excretion is the...
Antidotes serve a crucial role in counteracting the effects of poison by inhibiting enzymes responsible for producing harmful drug metabolites. In some cases, these toxic metabolites can be neutralized by endogenous cosubstrates, which are maintained at specific concentrations to prevent interaction with cellular macromolecules and subsequent cell death.
Renal excretion is the...
00:46Bioremediation
Bioremediation is the use of prokaryotes, fungi, or plants to remove pollutants from the environment. This process has been used to remove harmful toxins in groundwater as a byproduct of agricultural run-off and also to clean up oil spills.
01:17Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Precipitation and coprecipitation methods can be used to separate a mixture of ions in a solution. In qualitative inorganic analysis, ions that form sparingly soluble precipitates with the same reagent are separated based on the differences in solubility products. For example, consider the separation of Cu(II) and Fe(II) ions by precipitation as insoluble sulfides. First, copper(II) sulfide is precipitated by the addition of acidic H2S, where the dissociation of H2S is suppressed. Adding H2S...