Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Muscle Coordination and Action01:24

Muscle Coordination and Action

3.3K
Muscle coordination is a complex and finely tuned process essential for smooth and purposeful movements like flexion, extension, adduction, abduction, and rotation. The human body orchestrates the actions of various muscles working in concert, each with a specific role. Four functional types describe how muscles work together: agonist, antagonist, synergist, and fixator.
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement....
3.3K
Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions01:22

Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions

7.6K
Two primary types of muscle contractions are isotonic and isometric, each serving unique functions and involving distinct mechanisms. Both isotonic and isometric contractions are integral to the body's complex system of movement and stability. Isotonic exercises contribute significantly to functional strength and movement, while isometric contractions are crucial for maintaining posture and joint stability.
Isotonic contractions
Isotonic contractions occur when a muscle changes length while...
7.6K
Static and Kinetic Frictional Force01:05

Static and Kinetic Frictional Force

26.1K
One of the simpler characteristics of sliding friction is that it is parallel to the contact surfaces between systems, and is always in a direction that opposes the motion or attempted motion of the systems relative to each other. If two systems are in contact and moving relative to one another, then the friction between them is called kinetic friction. For example, kinetic friction slows a hockey puck sliding on ice.
However, if two systems are in contact and are stationary relative to one...
26.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Age-related differences in gait among community-dwelling senior adults in Japan: A cross-sectional study using a markerless motion analysis system.

Gait & posture·2026
Same author

Advances in footwear and surface for prevention of occupational slips and falls - A scoping review.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same author

Comparing Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy with generalised exercise for chronic spinal pain in surgeons: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

The effects of supervised exercise and pain neuroscience education on muscle strength and power in patients with chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: An exploratory analysis from the NEPNEP trial.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage open·2026
Same author

Walking with a Passive Hip Exoskeleton and Wearables: Gait Characteristics and Metabolic Power in Senior Adults.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Smart swim goggles accurately measure heart rate during swim training: A criterion validation study.

Journal of sports sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation
08:27

Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation

Published on: October 28, 2021

3.3K

Muscle coordination and force variability during static and dynamic tracking tasks.

Jacob H Svendsen1, Afshin Samani, Klaus Mayntzhusen

  • 1Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark.

Human Movement Science
|May 10, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reveals that dynamic tracking tasks increase muscle activity (SEMG) and force variability, while static tasks enhance muscle coordination. These findings highlight adaptive muscle control strategies during different tracking conditions.

More Related Videos

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum
07:30

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Published on: March 21, 2019

8.4K
Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback
06:31

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Published on: June 19, 2016

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation
08:27

Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation

Published on: October 28, 2021

3.3K
Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum
07:30

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Published on: March 21, 2019

8.4K
Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback
06:31

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Published on: June 19, 2016

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Understanding muscle activity and force variability is crucial for analyzing motor control strategies.
  • Static and dynamic tracking tasks elicit different neuromuscular responses.
  • Electromyography (SEMG) and force analysis provide insights into muscle function and coordination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate muscular activity patterns and force variability in wrist muscles during static and dynamic tracking tasks.
  • To compare the effects of compensatory and pursuit display modes on motor control.
  • To elucidate the underlying feedback and feed-forward control mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Fourteen volunteers performed isometric wrist tracking tasks (static and dynamic) at 20% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC).
  • Surface electromyography (SEMG) was recorded from key wrist flexor and extensor muscles.
  • Force signals were measured, and data analysis included SEMG amplitude, mutual information, force variability (standard deviation), and sample entropy.

Main Results:

  • Dynamic tracking tasks showed significantly larger SEMG amplitudes compared to static tasks (p<.05).
  • Static tracking tasks exhibited higher normalized mutual information between muscle pairs, indicating greater functional connectivity (p<.05).
  • Dynamic tasks resulted in increased force variability (larger standard deviation) and decreased complexity (smaller sample entropy) compared to static tasks (p<.01).

Conclusions:

  • Muscular activity and force variability are significantly modulated by the nature of the tracking task (static vs. dynamic).
  • The study suggests a rescaling of muscle contributions to manage force variability, employing different feedback and feed-forward control strategies.
  • Findings underscore the adaptability of the neuromuscular system in response to varying task demands and display modes.