Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Karyotyping01:17

Karyotyping

Describing the number and physical features of chromosomes can reveal abnormalities that underlie genetic diseases. This description is facilitated by special staining techniques that produce a particular banding pattern on each chromosome. State-of-the-art techniques make this approach even more powerful, enabling the detection of individual genes that cause disease.A Simple Chromosome Staining Technique Provides Valuable Scientific InsightSome genetic diseases can be detected by looking at...
Karyotyping01:17

Karyotyping

Describing the number and physical features of chromosomes can reveal abnormalities that underlie genetic diseases. This description is facilitated by special staining techniques that produce a particular banding pattern on each chromosome. State-of-the-art techniques make this approach even more powerful, enabling the detection of individual genes that cause disease.A Simple Chromosome Staining Technique Provides Valuable Scientific InsightSome genetic diseases can be detected by looking at...
Meiosis vs. Mitosis02:57

Meiosis vs. Mitosis

Cell division is necessary for growth and reproduction in organisms. Mitosis aids cell growth and development by dividing somatic cells. In contrast, meiosis causes the division of germ cells and plays an essential role in sexual reproduction. Due to their unique functional requirements, mitosis and meiosis differ from each other in multiple aspects.
Before the start of mitosis and meiosis I, the cell synthesizes DNA, resulting in two homologous copies of each chromosome. DNA synthesis is...
Nondisjunction01:21

Nondisjunction

Nondisjunction is the failure of homologous chromosomes or sister chromatids to separate correctly and move to the opposite poles of the cells. This produces daughter cells with abnormal chromosome numbers.  Nondisjunction is common during anaphase I or anaphase II of meiosis.  Mutations in synaptonemal complex proteins that attach homologous chromosomes increase the chances of nondisjunction in anaphase I of meiosis I. In contrast, mutations in topoisomerases and condensins that hold sister...
Nondisjunction01:29

Nondisjunction

During meiosis, chromosomes occasionally separate improperly. This occurs due to failure of homologous chromosome separation during meiosis I or failed sister chromatid separation during meiosis II. In some species, notably plants, nondisjunction can result in an organism with an entire additional set of chromosomes, which is called polyploidy. In humans, nondisjunction can occur during male or female gametogenesis and the resulting gametes possess one too many or one too few chromosomes.
Nondisjunction01:29

Nondisjunction

During meiosis, chromosomes occasionally separate improperly. This occurs due to failure of homologous chromosome separation during meiosis I or failed sister chromatid separation during meiosis II. In some species, notably plants, nondisjunction can result in an organism with an entire additional set of chromosomes, which is called polyploidy. In humans, nondisjunction can occur during male or female gametogenesis and the resulting gametes possess one too many or one too few chromosomes.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Explaining the Black-White Disparity in Preterm Birth: A Consensus Statement From a Multi-Disciplinary Scientific Work Group Convened by the March of Dimes.

Frontiers in reproductive health·2022
Same author

Newborn screening system: Safety, technology, advocacy.

Molecular genetics and metabolism·2021
Same author

Enabling Technologies for Personalized and Precision Medicine.

Trends in biotechnology·2020
Same author

Metabolite flux: A dynamic concept for inherited metabolic disorders as complex traits.

Molecular genetics and metabolism·2019
Same author

Preventable Preterm Birth: A Patient Safety Problem.

Pediatrics·2019
Same author

Modifier genes: Moving from pathogenesis to therapy.

Molecular genetics and metabolism·2017
Same journal

RNU4ATAC-opathy: Clinical, molecular and transcriptomic insights from a large cohort.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same journal

Expanding the clinical spectrum of RNU4ATAC-opathies: more frequent and diverse than assumed.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same journal

Delineating the clinical and molecular spectrum of the neurodevelopmental disorder associated with SET.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same journal

KMT2A and KMT2B episignatures address diagnostic challenges associated with rare neurodevelopmental disorders.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same journal

Beyond Mistrust: Diverse Biobanking Preferences Among Parents and Adolescents with Sickle Cell Disease.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same journal

Correspondence on "Optical mapping in Black genomes: Distinct LCR22 structures and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome mechanisms" by Pastor et al.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

In Vitro Modeling of Down Syndrome Neurogenesis Using Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
06:38

In Vitro Modeling of Down Syndrome Neurogenesis Using Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Published on: March 7, 2025

Down syndrome: coercion and eugenics.

Linda L McCabe1, Edward R B McCabe

  • 1Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
|May 11, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Insurance and government coercion limiting reproductive choices, particularly for families with Down syndrome, constitutes eugenics. This practice risks broader eugenic policies affecting other communities.

More Related Videos

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
05:51

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

Published on: June 15, 2011

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

In Vitro Modeling of Down Syndrome Neurogenesis Using Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
06:38

In Vitro Modeling of Down Syndrome Neurogenesis Using Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Published on: March 7, 2025

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
05:51

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

Published on: June 15, 2011

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Genetics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Reproductive choices are increasingly influenced by external pressures.
  • Discrimination against families with Down syndrome raises ethical concerns regarding eugenics.
  • Existing expert criteria define coercive practices as eugenic.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and analyze eugenic practices targeting families of children with Down syndrome.
  • To raise awareness within the clinical genetics community about reproductive coercion.
  • To prevent the expansion of eugenics toward other vulnerable groups.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of governmental rhetoric and policies related to eugenics.
  • Examination of commercial policies impacting reproductive choices for Down syndrome.
  • Review of expert definitions of eugenic practices.

Main Results:

  • Economic and social coercion limits reproductive autonomy for families with Down syndrome.
  • Governmental and commercial policies align with expert criteria for eugenics.
  • Clinical geneticists' tolerance of these practices may enable future eugenics.

Conclusions:

  • Coercion in reproductive healthcare, especially concerning Down syndrome, is a form of eugenics.
  • Sensitizing healthcare professionals is crucial to providing neutral genetic counseling.
  • Preventing eugenics against one group is vital to protecting all communities.