Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Controller Configurations01:22

Controller Configurations

Controller configurations are crucial in a car's cruise control system because they manage speed over time to maintain a consistent pace regardless of road conditions, thereby meeting design goals. In traditional control systems, fixed-configuration design involves predetermined controller placement. System performance modifications are known as compensation.
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller aligns...
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
Application of Antiderivatives: Linear Motion01:26

Application of Antiderivatives: Linear Motion

A derivative describes how one quantity changes with respect to another, such as how velocity changes over time. The reverse process, which recovers a quantity from its rate of change, is known as integration. In physics, integration is fundamental because it links related physical quantities, allowing acceleration, velocity, and displacement to be understood as connected aspects of motion.Consider a car traveling at a steady speed of 20 meters per second when an obstacle appears 800 meters...
Curvilinear Motion: Normal and Tangential Components01:27

Curvilinear Motion: Normal and Tangential Components

When a car traverses a curved road, its motion can be elucidated by breaking it down into tangential and normal components. The car-centric coordinates attached to the vehicle move with it.
The positive direction of the t-axis aligns with the increasing position of the car along the curved path, denoted by the unit vector ut. Simultaneously, the n-axis, perpendicular to the t-axis, dissects the curved path into differential arc segments, each forming the arc of a circle with a radius of...
Direction of Acceleration Vectors01:10

Direction of Acceleration Vectors

Acceleration occurs when velocity changes in magnitude (an increase or decrease in speed), direction, or both. Although acceleration is in the direction of the change in velocity, it is not always in the direction of motion. When an object slows down, its acceleration is opposite to the direction of its motion. This is commonly referred to as deceleration. However, the term deceleration can cause confusion in analysis because it is not a vector; it does not point to a specific direction with...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Getting back in the loop: Does autonomous driving duration affect driver's takeover performance?

Heliyon·2024
Same author

Does visual experience influence arm proprioception and its lateralization? Evidence from passive matching performance in congenitally-blind and sighted adults.

Neuroscience letters·2023
Same author

Perceived discomfort and neuromuscular fatigue during long-duration real driving with different car seats.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Joint Specificity and Lateralization of Upper Limb Proprioceptive Perception.

Perceptual and motor skills·2022
Same author

Changes in Electroencephalography Activity of Sensory Areas Linked to Car Sickness in Real Driving Conditions.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2022
Same author

Gradual exposure to Coriolis force induces sensorimotor adaptation with no change in peripersonal space.

Scientific reports·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Does tilt/translation ratio affect perception of deceleration in driving simulators?

Anca M Stratulat1, Vincent Roussarie, Jean-Louis Vercher

  • 1UMR 6233 Institut des Sciences du Mouvement, CNRS-Université de la Méditerranée, Faculté des Sciences du Sport, Marseille Cedex, France. anca.stratulat@gmail.com

Journal of Vestibular Research : Equilibrium & Orientation
|May 12, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Researchers experimentally determined the optimal tilt/translation ratio for simulating deceleration in driving simulators. The most realistic ratio for perceived braking intensity was found to be 35% tilt and 65% translation.

More Related Videos

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Vestibular system research
  • Human-computer interaction
  • Driving simulation technology

Background:

  • Tilt-coordination uses vestibular system ambiguity to simulate linear accelerations in driving simulators.
  • Current methods rely on empirically chosen tilt/translation ratios, lacking experimental validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally determine the most realistic tilt/translation ratio for simulating deceleration.
  • To investigate how different tilt/translation ratios affect the perception of braking intensity.

Main Methods:

  • Five inverse-proportional tilt/translation ratios were applied during driving simulations.
  • The total simulated deceleration value was kept constant at 0.8 m/s² across all ratios.

Main Results:

  • Different tilt/translation ratios resulted in significantly different perceptions of deceleration.
  • Higher tilt ratios led to a perception of stronger braking compared to higher translation ratios.
  • The most realistic ratio identified was 35% tilt and 65% translation.

Conclusions:

  • The perception of simulated deceleration is dependent on the specific tilt/translation ratio used.
  • An optimal, non-pure tilt or translation ratio (35/65%) enhances the realism of braking simulation.
  • Further discussion is needed on vestibular and non-vestibular factors influencing these perceptions.