Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026
11:38
High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)
Published on: May 10, 2016
Communication patterns for the most serious poison center calls
Lee Ellington1, Mollie Rebecca Poynton, Maija Reblin
1College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5880, USA. lee.ellington@nurs.utah.edu
Clinical Toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|May 14, 2011
Summary
Specialists in poison information (SPI) use four distinct communication styles during high-risk calls, balancing information, questions, and emotional support. These findings highlight opportunities for targeted communication training.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Health Communication
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Specialists in poison information (SPI) face unique communication challenges in healthcare.
- Understanding communication patterns is crucial for optimizing poison control center interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and describe communication patterns of SPIs during high-risk poison exposure calls using cluster analysis.
- To examine variations in these communication patterns and associated factors.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of one year of digital voice recordings from high-severity poison exposure calls.
- Utilized the Roter Interaction Analysis System for coding communication behaviors.
- Applied descriptive and cluster-analytic techniques to identify communication styles.
Main Results:
- Four distinct communication clusters were identified: Informational, Facilitative, Planning, and Emotional.
- The Informational cluster featured high SPI clinical information and caller questions.
- The Facilitative cluster showed high SPI questions and caller information provision.
- The Planning cluster was characterized by high SPI relationship talk.
- The Emotional cluster involved high levels of caller and SPI emotion.
- Relationships were found between call characteristics, SPI identity, and cluster membership.
Conclusions:
- SPIs employ a range of communication strategies, integrating information with emotional responsiveness and rapport building.
- The study provides foundational insights into SPI communication behaviors.
- Results suggest a need for communication training tailored to diverse caller needs.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Pharmaceutical poisoning can occur through various channels, impacting an estimated 2 million hospitalized patients in the U.S. annually with serious adverse drug responses. These scenarios encompass both therapeutic uses, such as drug toxicity, where even standard dosages can lead to severe central nervous system depression, and non-therapeutic exposures, including accidental ingestion by children, and environmental and occupational exposures.Unintentional poisonings often involve exploratory...
01:26Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Telephone and Verbal Reports in healthcare settings are two communication methods for conveying therapeutic instructions from healthcare providers to nurses or other healthcare staff.
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
01:30Toxidromes: Clinical Features
Toxidromes are specific patterns of symptoms resulting from toxic substance exposure. They help in the identification and treatment of poisoning. The symptoms of each toxidrome group indicate poisoning by a certain class of chemicals or drugs.1. Sympathomimetic: Stimulates the sympathetic nervous system. Symptoms include agitation, increased heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), respiratory rate (RR), temperature, and pupil size. Drugs like cocaine and amphetamines, along with tremors and...
01:26Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Treatment Strategies
Treatment strategies for poisoning are a critical aspect of emergency medicine, focusing on preventing the absorption of toxins and enhancing their elimination. When a poisoning incident occurs, the first response is to halt exposure and decontaminate the patient, particularly through gastrointestinal (GI) methods if the poison was ingested.Gastrointestinal Decontamination Techniques:Activated charcoal is the cornerstone of GI decontamination. It works through adsorption, binding the toxin to...
01:14Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison
In cases of acute poisoning, the primary objective is to prevent further absorption of the toxic substance into the body. Immediate interventions using various decontamination techniques targeting the gastrointestinal (GI) tract can achieve this. Decontamination is crucial to prevent poison from entering the systemic circulation, which involves washing affected areas with water and mild soap and removing contaminated clothing. Once external decontamination is done, attention must be turned to...
01:26Anticholinesterase Agents: Poisoning and Treatment
Anticholinesterases, also known as cholinesterase inhibitors, work by blocking the breakdown of acetylcholine, leading to its accumulation in the synaptic cleft. This accumulation indirectly enhances both muscarinic and nicotinic actions. These agents are classified as reversible or irreversible based on their mechanism of action.
Irreversible agents form a strong bond with the cholinesterase enzyme, making it inactive. The breakdown of the phosphorylated enzyme is slower than the...
Irreversible agents form a strong bond with the cholinesterase enzyme, making it inactive. The breakdown of the phosphorylated enzyme is slower than the...