Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

08:57
Measuring the Influence of Magnetic Vestibular Stimulation on Nystagmus, Self-Motion Perception, and Cognitive Performance in a 7T MRT
Published on: March 3, 2023
Practice variation in neuroimaging to evaluate dizziness in the ED
Anthony S Kim1, Stephen Sidney, Jeffrey G Klingman
1Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0114, USA. akim@ucsf.edu
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
|May 17, 2011
Summary
Neuroimaging use for emergency department dizziness patients varies widely, with no clear link to improved stroke diagnosis rates. This highlights a need for clearer guidelines on brain imaging for dizziness evaluations.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Neurology
- Radiology
Background:
- Guidelines and evidence are lacking on the appropriate use of neuroimaging for emergency department (ED) patients presenting with dizziness.
- Dizziness is a common chief complaint in EDs, necessitating evaluation to rule out serious conditions like stroke.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the variation in neuroimaging utilization (head CT and brain MRI) among EDs for patients with dizziness.
- To determine if higher rates of neuroimaging correlate with increased stroke diagnosis rates in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study analyzed data from 20 EDs within a large integrated health care program in 2008.
- Medical records were reviewed for adult patients with dizziness, capturing head computed tomography (CT) or brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and stroke diagnoses within specified timeframes.
- Statistical models (random-effects logistic and linear regression) were used to analyze variations in neuroimaging use and its relationship with stroke diagnosis rates, adjusting for patient and site factors.
Main Results:
- Out of 20,795 patients with dizziness, 26.9% received a head CT and 3.1% had a brain MRI.
- Significant variation in head CT (21.8%-32.8%) and brain MRI (0.8%-6.2%) use was observed across sites, even after adjusting for patient and site characteristics.
- Higher rates of neuroimaging did not correspond to higher rates of stroke diagnosis, with stroke identified in 0.7%-2.5% of patients with dizziness by site.
Conclusions:
- Substantial variability exists in the application of neuroimaging for evaluating ED patients with dizziness.
- Current neuroimaging practices for dizziness do not appear to improve the detection of stroke, which is a rare diagnosis in this cohort.
- The findings underscore the need for evidence-based guidelines to standardize neuroimaging use in the ED evaluation of dizziness.
