Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

A Two-Step Method for Percutaneous Transhepatic Choledochoscopic Lithotomy
Published on: September 13, 2022
The debate over percutaneous nephrolithotomy positioning: a comprehensive review
Brian Duty1, Zhamshid Okhunov, Arthur Smith
1Department of Urology, Long Island Jewish Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Both prone and supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy are feasible. Further randomized trials are necessary to definitively compare their efficacy and safety for kidney stone removal.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a key procedure for kidney stone removal.
- The choice between prone and supine positioning for PCNL remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the advantages and disadvantages of prone versus supine PCNL.
- To identify clinical factors that might favor one position over the other.
Main Methods:
- Literature search of PubMed for articles published since 1998.
- Included studies on anesthesia, organ movement, and PCNL case series.
Main Results:
- Prone position: decreased cardiac index, increased lung capacity, greater access surface area. Supine position: increased risk of liver/spleen injury (upper pole), potential colon injury (prone, lower pole), decreased surgeon radiation, spontaneous stone drainage, shorter operative time in comparative studies.
- Non-comparative series suggest prone PCNL may reduce operative time and blood loss for staghorn calculi.
Conclusions:
- Both prone and supine PCNL are viable options.
- More randomized controlled trials are required to establish definitive efficacy and morbidity differences.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies
Urinary Tract Calculi V: Nursing Management

