Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
Published on: February 6, 2020
Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing a new two-component compression system with inelastic
D-A A Lamprou1, Robert J Damstra, Hugo Partsch
1Department of Dermatology, Phlebology, and Lymphology, Nij Smellinghe Hospital, Drachten, The Netherlands.
Background:
New, less-bulky, short-stretch compression bandages could be a valuable alternative in the management of lymphedema of the leg.
Objective:
To compare the effectiveness of a two-component compression (2CC) system in the treatment of leg lymphedema with that of the traditional treatment with conventional inelastic multicomponent compression bandages (IMC).
Methods:
Thirty hospitalized patients with moderate to severe unilateral lymphedema (stage II-III) of the leg were included. Patients were divided in two groups; one (n=15) received a 2CC, and the other (n=15) received IMC. Primary outcome was volume reduction of the affected leg; secondary outcome was loss of interface pressure.
Results:
Median leg volumes before bandaging were 4,150 mL (2CC) and 4,360 mL (IMC). Median volume reduction after 2 hours was 120 mL (2.9%) with the 2CC system and 80 mL (1.8%) with IMC (p>.05). After 24 hours, volume reduction was 8.4% and 4.4% respectively (p>.05). Interface pressure dropped significantly within 2 hours of bandage application in both groups.
Conclusion:
Our results indicate that the 2CC system forms a suitable alternative to IMC in the conventional treatment of moderate to severe lymphedema.
Related Concept Videos
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management

