Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Conceptual debates and empirical evidence about the peer review process for scholarly journals
1University of Tennessee, College of Nursing, Knoxville, TN 37996-4180, USA. sthomas@utk.edu
Abstract:
Until recently, nursing scholars have seldom questioned the underlying premises of peer review, nor have they engaged in the conceptual debates about the peer review process. In this article, literature from a wide range of nursing and nonnursing journals was examined to provide an overview of (a) the conceptual debates and (b) the empirical evidence about the peer review process in scholarly journals. A multiplicity of questions for future research are proposed.
Related Concept Videos
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
